Page 84 of 393 FirstFirst ... 3474828384858694134184 ... LastLast
Results 831 to 840 of 3921

Thread: Comment Thread for The Resurrection of Jesus - Apologiaphoenix vs Gary

  1. #831
    tWebber Christianbookworm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Northern Hemisphere
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    9,460
    Amen (Given)
    5613
    Amen (Received)
    1809
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary View Post
    So the only supernatural claims that we should consider (and assume 100% true) are those made by mostly uneducated Christians living 2,000 years ago??
    There is evidence. Show me historical evidence or philosophical reasons for those fantastical peopple/creatures/objects to exist, and I would consider it. If Santa actually was giving presents to poor kids around the world, there would be evidence of gifts that no one had bought and a really fast object on radar screens(and violating physics, if someone could pull that stunt one would expect that person to not just be giving children toys). If leprechauns and goblins existed, one would find some kind of evidence given that they are supposed to be corporeal(poop, bodies).
    If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

  2. #832
    tWebber tabibito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    DownUnder
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    4,958
    Amen (Given)
    202
    Amen (Received)
    852
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary View Post
    Once again I must remind you conservative Christians that YOU are the ones making the extraordinary claim: the resurrection of a dead man. In our culture, like it or not, the person or persons making the extraordinary claim have the burden of proof to prove that claim. The burden of proof is NOT on those of us who question your extra-ordinary claim.

    As mentioned above, if you and your buddies believe that you had a conversation with a space alien last night, the onus is on YOU to give evidence of your claim if you expect anyone else to believe it. The onus is NOT on those of us who doubt your claim, to prove you did not have this extra-terrestial experience.
    Sorry to burst your bubble, but I happen to agree. Having seen a bonafide miracle, I can accept the reality of miracles and acknowledge their source. Were it not for a miracle, I would not believe: and I don't demand more of anyone else.

    And I assert that the only evidence that you have for your extra-ordinary claim is the following:

    1. Four anonymous books, written decades after the event, which describe the alleged appearances of this allegedly resurrected man, the four books containing numerous discrepancies, and two maybe three of those books borrowing heavily from the first to write their story of the event.

    2. The testimony of one man who believed he had seen a talking bright light on a lonely, desert highway.

    3. People who were willing to die for their belief.

    4. People in an honor shame society who were willing to believe a shameful belief.
    You assert things about my reason for belief without knowing anything of my reasons. Your assertions regarding the extent of discrepancies are exaggerated, the time of writing you ascribe to those books is highly questionable. The testimony of this "one man" is declared valid by another who investigated his claims.
    To me, this is poor evidence.
    A reasonable stand-point, on the face of it - but one which is not a result of personal investigation. You merely, naively, accept the word of others who claim to know what they are talking about. That you could parrot the claim that the Bible is shot through with contradictions demonstrates the fact adequately.
    There are many naturalistic explanations for each of these points.
    Let's see if I have understood you correctly ... You're saying that there are natural explanations for events that you declare could not possibly have happened.
    Christians are welcome to believe that this is sufficient evidence for THEM to believe, but more and more educated people are seeing this evidence as nothing more than the hysteria and superstitions of uneducated, superstitious ancient peoples, no different than the origins of many other superstitious beliefs in human history.
    Ah - you're intellectually superior to every Christian in existence. That's quite a faith claim.
    1 Cor 15:34 εκνηψατε δικαιως και μη αμαρτανετε αγνωσιαν γαρ θεου τινες εχουσιν προς εντροπην υμιν λεγω

  3. Amen LostSheep, Chrawnus amen'd this post.
  4. #833
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Faith
    Non-supernaturalist
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    4,123
    Amen (Given)
    55
    Amen (Received)
    181
    Quote Originally Posted by Christianbookworm View Post
    There is evidence. Show me historical evidence or philosophical reasons for those fantastical peopple/creatures/objects to exist, and I would consider it. If Santa actually was giving presents to poor kids around the world, there would be evidence of gifts that no one had bought and a really fast object on radar screens(and violating physics, if someone could pull that stunt one would expect that person to not just be giving children toys). If leprechauns and goblins existed, one would find some kind of evidence given that they are supposed to be corporeal(poop, bodies).
    So are you saying that we should only consider those supernatural claims which have believers/followers of the claim? Any other criteria?

  5. #834
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Faith
    Non-supernaturalist
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    4,123
    Amen (Given)
    55
    Amen (Received)
    181
    Quote Originally Posted by tabibito View Post
    Sorry to burst your bubble, but I happen to agree. Having seen a bonafide miracle, I can accept the reality of miracles and acknowledge their source. Were it not for a miracle, I would not believe: and I don't demand more of anyone else.

    You assert things about my reason for belief without knowing anything of my reasons. Your assertions regarding the extent of discrepancies are exaggerated, the time of writing you ascribe to those books is highly questionable. The testimony of this "one man" is declared valid by another who investigated his claims.
    A reasonable stand-point, on the face of it - but one which is not a result of personal investigation. You merely, naively, accept the word of others who claim to know what they are talking about. That you could parrot the claim that the Bible is shot through with contradictions demonstrates the fact adequately.
    Let's see if I have understood you correctly ... You're saying that there are natural explanations for events that you declare could not possibly have happened.
    Ah - you're intellectually superior to every Christian in existence. That's quite a faith claim.
    No, you have misunderstood, my friend. There are many naturalistic explanations for why early Christians came to believe in a resurrection, an empty tomb, and for why Paul believed that a dead man had appeared to him.

  6. #835
    tWebber Christianbookworm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Northern Hemisphere
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    9,460
    Amen (Given)
    5613
    Amen (Received)
    1809
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary View Post
    So are you saying that we should only consider those supernatural claims which have believers/followers of the claim? Any other criteria?
    I already told you the kind of evidence those claims would need! Are you just playing dumb, or are you really this dense? Boy are fundy atheists/agnostics/nontheists annoying!
    If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

  7. #836
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Faith
    Non-supernaturalist
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    4,123
    Amen (Given)
    55
    Amen (Received)
    181
    Quote Originally Posted by Christianbookworm View Post
    I already told you the kind of evidence those claims would need! Are you just playing dumb, or are you really this dense? Boy are fundy atheists/agnostics/nontheists annoying!
    I apologize for my stupidity. Would you please direct me to your previous comment?

  8. #837
    Must...have...caffeine One Bad Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Inside the beltway
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    21,226
    Amen (Given)
    6264
    Amen (Received)
    11959
    Quote Originally Posted by Adrift View Post
    I see you're in full troll mode now.
    He's been in full troll mode for quite some time. He's been studiously ignoring me for a good 20 pages or so now.
    Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. St. John Chrysostom

    Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio

    I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

  9. Amen Adrift amen'd this post.
  10. #838
    Must...have...caffeine One Bad Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Inside the beltway
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    21,226
    Amen (Given)
    6264
    Amen (Received)
    11959
    Quote Originally Posted by fm93 View Post
    Gary is setting a world record for the number of times he can fail to grasp the distinction between reanimation and resurrection.
    Oh, he's aware of the distinction.
    Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. St. John Chrysostom

    Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio

    I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

  11. Amen Adrift amen'd this post.
  12. #839
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Faith
    Non-supernaturalist
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    4,123
    Amen (Given)
    55
    Amen (Received)
    181
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary View Post
    So are you saying that we should only consider those supernatural claims which have believers/followers of the claim? Any other criteria?
    Here is a supernatural claim of one major world religion, Hinduism. Do you find this supernatural claim believable? If not, why not?

    Question: Is it possible to speak to Iswara (God) as Sri Ramakrishna did?

    Sri Ramana Maharshi: When we speak to each other why should we not speak to Iswara in the same way?

    Question: Then why does it not happen with us?

    Sri Ramana Maharshi: It requires purity and strength of mind and practice in meditation.

    Question: Does God become evident if the above conditions exist?

    Sri Ramana Maharshi: Such manifestations are as real as your own reality. In other words, when you identify yourself with the body, as in the waking state, you see gross objects. When in the subtle body or in the mental plane as in dreams, you see objects equally subtle. In the absence of identification in deep sleep you see nothing. The objects seen bear a relation to the state of the seer. The same applies to visions of God.

    By long practice the figure of God, as meditated upon, appears in dreams and may later appear in the waking state also.

    Gary: Do you believe that devout Hindus can become so pure of heart and mind that their gods will appear to them in the waking state, as did Jesus to his devout followers?

  13. #840
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Surrey, England
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    552
    Amen (Given)
    52
    Amen (Received)
    464
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary View Post
    Here is a supernatural claim of one major world religion, Hinduism. Do you find this supernatural claim believable? If not, why not?

    Question: Is it possible to speak to Iswara (God) as Sri Ramakrishna did?

    Sri Ramana Maharshi: When we speak to each other why should we not speak to Iswara in the same way?

    Question: Then why does it not happen with us?

    Sri Ramana Maharshi: It requires purity and strength of mind and practice in meditation.

    Question: Does God become evident if the above conditions exist?

    Sri Ramana Maharshi: Such manifestations are as real as your own reality. In other words, when you identify yourself with the body, as in the waking state, you see gross objects. When in the subtle body or in the mental plane as in dreams, you see objects equally subtle. In the absence of identification in deep sleep you see nothing. The objects seen bear a relation to the state of the seer. The same applies to visions of God.

    By long practice the figure of God, as meditated upon, appears in dreams and may later appear in the waking state also.

    Gary: Do you believe that devout Hindus can become so pure of heart and mind that their gods will appear to them in the waking state, as did Jesus to his devout followers?
    Gary this is a false parallel from the start since the disciples had not spent ages meditating and purifying their hearts when they saw Jesus eg Peter had recently denied Him. There was no work, "strength of mind and practice in meditation", required.
    In anycase it seems clear to me that the implication carried within what Sri Ramana Maharshi is telling these questioners, is that such purity as is needed actually requires you redefine your own identity and that might mean eschewing the physical.
    Last edited by Abigail; 08-03-2015 at 03:03 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •