Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix
View Post
Obviously someone who cannot recognize sarcasm.
You also have been claiming that I agreed to accept certain claims with you.
I did no such thing.
Your statement elsewhere is
http://danielbwallace.com/2014/03/24...#comment-44395
This tells us you're someone who knows the rules and tries to violate them for what purpose?
Tie this in with what you said on your blog.
http://www.lutherwasnotbornagain.com...claim-and.html
I agreed to no such thing.
This means you are a known rulebreaker and you spread dishonest claims.
And yet you're supposed to be seen as a person who knows the truth.
You also have been claiming that I agreed to accept certain claims with you.
I did no such thing.
Your statement elsewhere is
So I debated, but I debated going out of my way to break the “debate rules”. I used analogies to demonstrate that the Christian supernatural (Nick HATES that word) claims are just as unbelievable and nonsensical as the belief in the Tooth Fairy and leprechauns.”
http://danielbwallace.com/2014/03/24...#comment-44395
This tells us you're someone who knows the rules and tries to violate them for what purpose?
Tie this in with what you said on your blog.
I tell you what. I'm going to make this debate much easier for Nick and the other Christians participating in this discussion. Nick and I have already agreed to accept the following three points as historical facts for this discussion:
1. The empty tomb.
2. The first gospel, Mark, was written no earlier than the mid 60's AD and the other three gospels were written one to several decades later.
3. None of the gospels were written by eyewitnesses.
1. The empty tomb.
2. The first gospel, Mark, was written no earlier than the mid 60's AD and the other three gospels were written one to several decades later.
3. None of the gospels were written by eyewitnesses.
http://www.lutherwasnotbornagain.com...claim-and.html
I agreed to no such thing.
This means you are a known rulebreaker and you spread dishonest claims.
And yet you're supposed to be seen as a person who knows the truth.
Comment