Originally posted by Irate Canadian
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Eschatology 201 Guidelines
This area of the forum is primarily for Christian theists to discuss orthodox views of Eschatology. Other theist participation is welcome within that framework, but only within orthodoxy. Posts from nontheists that do not promote atheism or seek to undermine the faith of others will be permitted at the Moderator's discretion - such posters should contact the area moderators before posting.
Without turning this forum into a 'hill of foreskins' (Joshua 5:3), I believe we can still have fun with this 'sensitive' topic.
However, don't be misled, dispensationalism has only partly to do with circumcision issues. So, let's not forget about Innocence, Conscience, Promises, Kingdoms and so on.
End time -isms within orthodox Christianity also discussed here. Clearly unorthodox doctrines, such as those advocating "pantelism/full preterism/Neo-Hymenaeanism" or the denial of any essential of the historic Christian faith are not permitted in this section but can be discussed in Comparative Religions 101 without restriction. Any such threads, as well as any that within the moderator's discretions fall outside mainstream evangelical belief, will be moved to the appropriate area.
Millennialism- post-, pre- a-
Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism, or just your garden variety Zionism.
From the tribulation to the anichrist. Whether your tastes run from Gary DeMar to Tim LaHaye or anywhere in between, your input is welcome here.
OK folks, let's roll!
Forum Rules: Here
Without turning this forum into a 'hill of foreskins' (Joshua 5:3), I believe we can still have fun with this 'sensitive' topic.
However, don't be misled, dispensationalism has only partly to do with circumcision issues. So, let's not forget about Innocence, Conscience, Promises, Kingdoms and so on.
End time -isms within orthodox Christianity also discussed here. Clearly unorthodox doctrines, such as those advocating "pantelism/full preterism/Neo-Hymenaeanism" or the denial of any essential of the historic Christian faith are not permitted in this section but can be discussed in Comparative Religions 101 without restriction. Any such threads, as well as any that within the moderator's discretions fall outside mainstream evangelical belief, will be moved to the appropriate area.
Millennialism- post-, pre- a-
Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism, or just your garden variety Zionism.
From the tribulation to the anichrist. Whether your tastes run from Gary DeMar to Tim LaHaye or anywhere in between, your input is welcome here.
OK folks, let's roll!
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Does preterism lead to atheism?
Collapse
X
-
you ended your last statement with a question mark, which is why I answered."It's evolution; every time you invent something fool-proof, the world invents a better fool."
-Unknown
"Preach the gospel, and if necessary use words." - Most likely St.Francis
I find that evolution is the best proof of God.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I support the :
sigpic
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by seanD View PostOne preterist doesn't explain to me why the belief is so ingrained in this forum as opposed to anywhere else, was what I was curious about.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darfius View PostIf I had to guess, I think Holding being a preterist has something to do with it, since he was responsible for a lot of the traffic to this forum back in the day. His apologetical work is top-notch, so people might have assumed that his eschatology was equally as sound, though you and I know it isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seanD View PostTrue, and he's the reason I found this forum. It also seems there are futurists here but they aren't as vocal about it. For example, there have been preterists that have started threads attacking futurism that don't get as much attention (other than you and me lol) than when a thread is started by a futurist attacking preterism.
However, I have very little care to be dogmatic on eschatology unless someone denies the bodily resurrection. I think do not think partial Preterism leads to atheism anymore than anything else, besides, I hold to preserverence of the Saints, this Rodrick fellow must never have been a Christian of he's apostacized.Does he who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you do so by works of the law, or by hearing with faith? -Galatians 3:5
Comment
-
Originally posted by seanD View PostTrue, and he's the reason I found this forum. It also seems there are futurists here but they aren't as vocal about it. For example, there have been preterists that have started threads attacking futurism that don't get as much attention (other than you and me lol) than when a thread is started by a futurist attacking preterism.Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.--Isaiah 1:17
I don't think that all forms o[f] slavery are inherently immoral.--seer
Comment
-
Originally posted by seanD View PostOne preterist doesn't explain to me why the belief is so ingrained in this forum as opposed to anywhere else, was what I was curious about.
Comment
-
The problem is not perterism. But the path to perterism and the path to atheism do have some common points of intersection.
One can make the argument that pre-trib dispensationalism leads to Biblical preterism.
What pre-trib dispensationalist and Biblical preterism have in common is the belief in an imminent return of Christ. [As a post-trib (pre-wrath view) I reject a now imminent coming of Christ.] For the pre-trib dispensationalism this imminent return is even now pending. For the Biblical perterist it was an historic fact which took place.
The key verses that branches off to either denial of the historic Christian faith or results in the Biblical perterist view is typically found in our chapter 24 of Matthew.
". . . when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, [even] at the doors. Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. . . ." The "ye" and "this generation" being interpreted as Jesus' disciples and in that current generation to whom He is speaking.
So either it is a failed prophecy, those disciples and the generation long since past. Or it took place in those disciples and that current generation's life time.
If viewed as a failed prophecy - leads to a logical denial of the faith - atheism is a possible outcome.
If viewed from a historical Biblical perspective, the word of God being inerrant, Biblical perterism is the logical conclusion.
Personally I hold a post-trib pre-wrath yet future view of those events referred to by the words "when ye shall see all these things." The "ye" not being limited to those to whom Jesus at that time spoke.
One can argue for each case, yes. But to understand each case from each view, that must be done regardless of view held.Last edited by 37818; 08-05-2015, 08:04 AM.. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV
Comment
-
Originally posted by fm93 View PostI don't think preterism necessarily excludes the possibility of multiple fulfillments of prophecy, so it's theoretically possible that a dystopian beast-worshipping government could arise regardless of which eschatological view is true. And if such a government arose, doesn't Jesus imply in Matthew 24:24 that the elect will not be deceived? It seems that no matter what happens, the only way you could argue that preterists would choose the wrong action is by asserting that no preterists are part of the elect...a road that I'm sure you're bright enough to not take.
This is still a problem of life and death(not eternal) even if they aren't deceived, because those who do not worship the beast are to be executed. This is of course under a futurist, post tribulation rapture scenario. So, I don't see how you got what you did out of my posts.
To say that there are no elect preterists goes way too far, yes. To think that there are those in all denominations and nonessential belief groups that are not elect is not however.
I don't have much agreement with Darfius(I am a futurist, but not post tribulation rapture. I haven't studied eschatology much though.), but IC was missing a rather big part of what would happen under the scenario Darfius believes.
You think he cares?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pentecost View PostAfter having read the Scriptures, read commentaries, and studied the basics of all the positions, plus an Unbelievable podcast that Dee Dee was on, I was thoroughly unconvinced of Preterism, and thoroughly convinced of a pre-Wrath understanding of the rapture.
However, I have very little care to be dogmatic on eschatology unless someone denies the bodily resurrection. I think do not think partial Preterism leads to atheism anymore than anything else, besides, I hold to preserverence of the Saints, this Rodrick fellow must never have been a Christian of he's apostacized.Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cerebrum123 View Post
Although I have noticed that some fundamentalist Christians on TWeb (who are generally futurists) tend to be more sexist then those not in that camp. I'm not saying that all futurists are sexists, but I think they have a higher percentage of people who believe women to be lesser, probably because they are a bigger and more conservative then the other groups."It's evolution; every time you invent something fool-proof, the world invents a better fool."
-Unknown
"Preach the gospel, and if necessary use words." - Most likely St.Francis
I find that evolution is the best proof of God.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I support the :
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by seanD View PostOn Tweb, definitely. But I haven't meant one preterist outside of Tweb, neither online or in real life, which is odd to me. I take it Tweb was originally started with like-minded preterists or something?"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot
"Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman
My Personal Blog
My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)
Quill Sword
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostNo, you haven't. Roderick E was, like Sam Frost, a hyperpreterist. Saying otherwise is a flat out lie easily exposed by merely reading the link you gave to Roderick E.'s blog.
What is wrong with you? You didn't use to be this trollish.
http://unpreterist.blogspot.com/2013...ee-warren.html
However, the original link applies 1000% to partial as well as full preterism.
http://unpreterist.blogspot.com/2014...onclusion.html
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seanD, 01-22-2024, 08:20 PM
|
23 responses
223 views
2 likes
|
Last Post 02-24-2024, 09:40 AM |
Comment