I came across a quite hilarious and yet interesting ranking of the candidates today: By the grammar quality of their supporters.
A study went to each candidate's facebook page, and randomly selected posts by supporters of the candidate (making sure they were actually supporting the candidate, and not opposed to them) and then ran spelling & grammar-checking software over the posts. This gives some insight into the question of how educated the supporters of any given candidate are - or conversely tells us what candidates educated people are supporting.
Here are the results, giving the error-rates and vocabulary for supporters of each candidate:
A study went to each candidate's facebook page, and randomly selected posts by supporters of the candidate (making sure they were actually supporting the candidate, and not opposed to them) and then ran spelling & grammar-checking software over the posts. This gives some insight into the question of how educated the supporters of any given candidate are - or conversely tells us what candidates educated people are supporting.
Here are the results, giving the error-rates and vocabulary for supporters of each candidate:
Comment