Iowa today held a "youth caucus" in which more than 1600 high-school students across the state voted in mock caucuses. Results were:
Carson - 22%
Trump - 15%
Rubio - 15%
Paul - 14%
Cruz - 8%
Sanders - 53%
O'Malley - 24%
Hillary - 15%
On the Republican side, those results are very similar to what standard polling is reporting, except for Paul who is doing much better with the youth vote than he is in general polling (unsurprisingly since libertarianism has always been quite popular among college students).
On the Democratic side, those numbers are very very different to what standard polling is saying, however they agree with the common finding that Sanders dominates the youth vote while Hillary dominates the older demographics. This is actually becoming a very very serious problem for the accuracy of democratic primary polling in general: Polling agencies often try to be 'sure' that a person they are polling is actually going to vote in the primary, and the most common method of doing this is to ask them whether they have voted in previous primaries, with only people who have voted in the two (or even four) previous primaries being kept in the final poll results. However, this artificially excludes young people, and subsequently skews the polls along demographic lines.
Carson - 22%
Trump - 15%
Rubio - 15%
Paul - 14%
Cruz - 8%
Sanders - 53%
O'Malley - 24%
Hillary - 15%
On the Republican side, those results are very similar to what standard polling is reporting, except for Paul who is doing much better with the youth vote than he is in general polling (unsurprisingly since libertarianism has always been quite popular among college students).
On the Democratic side, those numbers are very very different to what standard polling is saying, however they agree with the common finding that Sanders dominates the youth vote while Hillary dominates the older demographics. This is actually becoming a very very serious problem for the accuracy of democratic primary polling in general: Polling agencies often try to be 'sure' that a person they are polling is actually going to vote in the primary, and the most common method of doing this is to ask them whether they have voted in previous primaries, with only people who have voted in the two (or even four) previous primaries being kept in the final poll results. However, this artificially excludes young people, and subsequently skews the polls along demographic lines.
Comment