Report Tekton/Tektoon problems here

[jpholding]

Oh, one question - what's the deal with the Sk'lan ears? Some with, some without, variations in shape - is this supposed to be happening or are you forgetting ears the way you keep forgetting the second foot?

It's supposed to be happening.

Suggestion: if you haven't already, you might want to consider a story board of the characters and races. You've got a lot going on and it gets hard to keep all the particulars straight - especially when you have a large supporting cast.

I think I do have that already in the intro material at http://www.tektoonics.com/almanac.html for example.

[Teallaura]

ST #2 Insider:
2nd line - close parenthesis is backwards.

RP # 3
Pg 3, pnl 4
Betsy's hair is in a ponytail but is down in the other pics.

ST #4

Insider:
Paragraph 4, sentence 3 (Near the end) 'soldiers' not 'soliders' (Unless they are more solid than every body else! )

P 4, S 4 - ditto

P 6 "Someone else" - Incomplete sentence

P 7 - subscriber only rules and prices are out of date.


ST # 5

Pg 15, pnl 4
"News article"
Also: 3rd from bottom: 'despite'

Pg 23, pnl 4
Ketterling's

ST #5 Insider:

Paragraph 5, sentence 2
Nathanael

P 6 Sen 2
"exactly"


Molinist page

P 3 Sen 1
'judgments' not 'judgements'

Non-uniform spelling on Phyllonshrike - is it one word, two words or hyphenated? I've seen all three.

ST # 6

Pg 4
Panels 4 and 5 - what is the S'klan's name? L'rooz or L'mont?

Panel 10 "one will" should be 'with'

Pg 29 - tagline 'more coming soon' needs to be removed.

Pg pnl 12
Vengence is mispelled

Pg 44 - nitpick: it's 'enslavement', not 'slavery'. Slavery is the condition - enslavement is the act. I imagine everyone will get what you mean, but it is technically incorrect.


RP # 1

pg 21, pnl 6
"preparatory'

pg 32, pnl 3
'suppose'


ST # 1

There isn't a page 22 but you have one listed in the Chapter Jump.

RP # 7

pg 47, pnl 2
"that they desire' not 'that the desire'

pg 50, pnl 6 - why is the moon an outline?


ST # 3

pg 32, pnl 3
"What was that" should be "What is it that"

ST # 4

Pg , pnl
'subtly' not 'subtely'

Pg 15. Panel 9
'subterfuge' not 'subtrefuge'

No ST # 5 link on Insider page.
Ditto ST 5 to RP 6
Ditto RP 6 to ST 6

RP # 7

Pg 33, panels 1 & 2
"Are you awake?"
"..nah, been awake for awhile."
Incongruity between question and answer

[Teallaura]

On ST 7:

1) I'll have to check, but I could have sworn the news reporter said there were 20 fatalities at Greeter's Pass but the Prycene king says there were none.

2) Okay, the Insider page helps a lot. Doesn't quite explain Brom's ability to forget his feelings for Sheila so quickly but maybe that's just not evident yet. But I do have one question - if Brom is so concerned with what others think why hasn't he considered what the RPers will think? From their POV he comes off badly - and likely not winning any friends among Sheila's family. He isn't just 'disappointing' Sheila - he's going to hurt her and he knows it. He can't think that's gonna be cool with her family - that wouldn't make sense from the H/S framework we've seen thus far. At the very least wouldn't he expect the RPers to take it as an affront to their honor?

[jpholding]

But I do have one question - if Brom is so concerned with what others think why hasn't he considered what the RPers will think?

That's a tension people in an agonistic society frequently have to live and deal with: Which group do you please? This one has a lot of tension for Brom because it involves loyalty to nation and the greater good versus loyalty to friends. The question ends up being, to which ingroup are your loyalties strongest, and where will the greater good be done for all (not just you or a few people)?

At the very least wouldn't he expect the RPers to take it as an affront to their honor?

I may not have said so, but I assume that he is vaguely aware that honor isn't regarded as being as important among the Nullaborians. Still, even if not, he'd have to weigh it all in the balance.

There's a reason why this is all called agonistic.

[Teallaura]

I was right - ST #4 has 20 fatalities but King Filly Boy (sorry, couldn't resist!) says there were none.


http://www.tektoonics.com/shriketoon...etoon4014.html

[jpholding]

I was right - ST #4 has 20 fatalities but King Filly Boy (sorry, couldn't resist!) says there were none.


http://www.tektoonics.com/shriketoon...etoon4014.html

Hmm, well, have to decide which to get rid of then. Probably will be the ST #4 one.

[Teluog]

http://www.tektonics.org/lp/moswater.html:

In the story of the Ten Plagues,t Moses and Aaron turn all the water in the Nile into blood.

Also, bad link, not found, and can't seem to find the article searching around the website: http://www.christiananswers.net/abr/redtides.html

On the hardening of pharaoh's hard, the link you have is bad because you have a capital "H" at the end of the URL that should be lower case: http://www.christian-thinktank.com/hharden.html
There are also a couple additional articles on the same topic by Miller:
1) http://www.christian-thinktank.com/moharden.html
2) http://www.christian-thinktank.com/g...er.html#harden

[Teluog]

http://www.tektonics.org/TK-EXOD.html:

Exodus 12:40
Now the length of time the Israelite people lived in Egypt was 430 years. Is this in contradiction with Gen. 15:13, which says 400 years? No, because Exodus gives the number of years that the people lived in Egypt; Genesis gives the number of years they would be enslaved and mistreated -- the enslavement/mistreatment did not start right away! he promises were made to Abraham and his seed. The last statement of promise recorded was to Jacob (Gen. 28:15), and that is where the 430 years dates from.

I'm guessing you mean "The promises . . "

[Teallaura]

But then again - a "why not" is not evidence? Why SHOULD we consider a positive story of his birth to actually be NEGATIVE evidence for what it says?

http://www.tektonics.org/uz/virginbirth.html

(Sixth Paragraph UP from Conclusion.)

The first sentence isn't a question - you got a little carried away with all the question marks there.

[Teallaura]

excatly as they desire to be and to the extent that their deeds demanded.

*emphasis mine


http://www.tektonics.org/uz/2muchshame.html

[Teluog]

http://www.tektonics.org/books/starterbooks.html

Gregory Boyd, Letters to a Skeptic

Buy This Book Now
From Amazon.com

Those of you who have unsaved loved ones who are Skeptics will be particularly touched by Letters from a Skeptic.

The correct one is "from." I just purchased this book at the thrift store across the street for $3

[Requiem]

There's more: the link to Win Corduan's "Reasonable Faith" (now reprinted as "No Doubt About It") leads to Boyd's book instead.

[Raphael]

Typo
http://www.tektonics.org/ezine/loftu...tus2index.html

Special Foreword by Jason Berggren, author of 10 Thigs I Hate About Christianity

http://www.tektonics.org/ezine/loftus3/fberg.html

associated with TCD, inclding John Loftus.

[Raphael]

http://www.tektonics.org/lp/osteen01.html has that weird pic of Sparko saying he's nicked the page.

infact all the links from here are dead:

Guest report here plus some off site items here and here; and a broader view as well of the problem behind Osteen's sort of teaching.

[LilPunkishOfTerror]

ooh! I've found a spelling mistake in the mithrabuster film...that's going to be a bit difficult to correct (redemer at 1m 53s)