Exposing the Heterosexual Agenda

[Jichard]

Because prejudice is often worth parodying...

"The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing the Myths"

exactlyboldface type, information that they will never share about their sources"

Right, love won! No perversion won...

Indeed: heterosexuality's perversion.

[Darth Executor]

Unfortunately, writing a parody does not change the fact that homosexuality is a mental disorder with serious (mostly negative) consequences to both the sufferer and the rest of society.

[Starlight]

Unfortunately, writing a parody does not change the fact that homosexuality is a mental disorder with serious (mostly negative) consequences to both the sufferer and the rest of society.

I suspect your mental disorders could fill a page. And unlike your delusional fantasies of homosexuality as an imaginary mental disorder, the things wrong with you seem to be both real and serious.

[Darth Executor]

Your rage doesn't change biological reality.

[Starlight]

Because prejudice is often worth parodying...[INDENT]"The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing the Myths"

Although it's often pointless trying to parody extreme fundamentalist views. Poe's law essentially says that because fundamentalist extremism is already so absurd and ridiculous and such a joke in and of itself, that it is impossible to actually make a joke out of it without it being confused for the real thing.

There's already plenty of conservative Christian extremists out there who seriously believe that there are gay people who are anti-heterosexual in the same kind of way that the Christians themselves are anti-gay. It's projection all the way... they assume "well, because I'm out to get them, then they must be out to get me". The same sort of projection came up recently in this forum in another thread with conservatives Christians assuming atheists must be all out to get them.

[Leonhard]

Although it's often pointless trying to parody extreme fundamentalist views. Poe's law essentially says that because fundamentalist extremism is already so absurd and ridiculous and such a joke in and of itself, that it is impossible to actually make a joke out of it without it being confused for the real thing.

There's already plenty of conservative Christian extremists out there who seriously believe that there are gay people who are anti-heterosexual in the same kind of way that the Christians themselves are anti-gay. It's projection all the way... they assume "well, because I'm out to get them, then they must be out to get me". The same sort of projection came up recently in this forum in another thread with conservatives Christians assuming atheists must be all out to get them.

Beautiful strawman.

[Starlight]

Beautiful strawman.

Apparently you have completely no clue what a "strawman" is.

[Leonhard]

Apparently you have completely no clue what a "strawman" is.

Your post was a textbook example of it. You give a strong misrepresentation of our position, that is ridiculous, so that its easily shot down. I think you're not doing it on purpose, I believe what you're saying is what you've experienced that thread to be. However its still a misrepresentation.

[klaus54]

Heterosexual agenda = Traditional non-PC non-social engineered societal standards of morality???

[Jichard]

Although it's often pointless trying to parody extreme fundamentalist views. Poe's law essentially says that because fundamentalist extremism is already so absurd and ridiculous and such a joke in and of itself, that it is impossible to actually make a joke out of it without it being confused for the real thing.

There's already plenty of conservative Christian extremists out there who seriously believe that there are gay people who are anti-heterosexual in the same kind of way that the Christians themselves are anti-gay. It's projection all the way... they assume "well, because I'm out to get them, then they must be out to get me". The same sort of projection came up recently in this forum in another thread with conservatives Christians assuming atheists must be all out to get them.

*sigh* Poe's Law is still undefeated.

[Jichard]

Your rage doesn't change biological reality.

What "rage"?

And what "biological reality" are you talking about? Do you mean the biological reality of same-sex sexual behavior going on in numerous species, including humans?

[Jichard]

Unfortunately, writing a parody does not change the fact that homosexuality is a mental disorder with serious (mostly negative) consequences to both the sufferer and the rest of society.

Any evidence for those claims?

Last I checked, the latest DSM does not categorize homosexuality as a mental disorder? And there don't seem to be any negative consequences intrinsic to being homosexual.

[Jichard]

Heterosexual agenda = Traditional non-PC non-social engineered societal standards of morality???

You mean the polygamy that's present in the Old Testament?

... Oh wait a second, by "Traditional non-PC non-social engineered societal standards of morality" do you mean to only refer to the West in, say, the last century or so. Because if I remember correctly, various places in the West forbade things like inter-racial marriage. Should be go back to that as "Traditional non-PC non-social engineered societal standards of morality"?

[Darth Executor]

What "rage"?

Starlight always throws fits of rage when I bring up the negative consequences of homosexuality.

And what "biological reality" are you talking about? Do you mean the biological reality of same-sex sexual behavior going on in numerous species, including humans?

The biological reality that homosexuality suppresses a basic function of life (reproduction) and gay men (and to a lesser extent, lesbians) engage in self destructive behavior, which is what one would expect when individuals' brains aren't functioning properly. The presence of same-sex sexual behavior in numerous species no more prevents it from being a disorder than the presence of cancer in numerous species, also including humans.

[Darth Executor]

Any evidence for those claims?

Last I checked, the latest DSM does not categorize homosexuality as a mental disorder?

Psychology isn't an actual science and psychology associations tend to be overrun by far left degenerates so they're not worth anything as a source even if they were. To use an analogy you might understand, quoting the DSM on whether homosexuality is a mental disorder is like telling an atheist God exists because the Bible says so. I have no more need to put my faith in the DSM than you believe you have to put yours in the Bible.

And there don't seem to be any negative consequences intrinsic to being homosexual.

Rampant promiscuity among male homosexuals and its various consequences (namely, gathering so many STDs that their average livespan craters compared to the rest of the population) is the most obvious one. Some claim that it's because men in general have a higher sex drive, but that's actually a confirmation that this is a problem intristic to being homosexuals as female pickiness acts as a dampener on this behavior in heterosexual couples. The opposite happens among lesbians who, ironically, end up avoiding sex altogether, getting morbidliy obese and reducing their lifespan anyway, only this time via heart attacks rather than atrophying into an AIDS skeleton before turning to dust like a staked vampire.