Announcement

Collapse

Natural Science 301 Guidelines

This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.

As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Intelligence and Religiosity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Jichard View Post
    Apparently not to people like you. From the way you people are posting, you seem to think that all of modern science is basically astronomy and physics. So the only pioneers of modern science are physicists/astronomers and mathmeticians who mathematics contributed to physics and astronomy..

    Sorry, but that's absurd.
    That is absurd, but it's not the argument being made. If the only way you can refute someone's argument is to mischaracterize it, you've failed. I'm beginning to think you started this thread because you're not all that bright yourself, and you needed a little boost of self-esteem via association.
    Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom

    Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
    sigpic
    I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

    Comment


    • Originally posted by One Bad Pig View Post
      That is absurd, but it's not the argument being made. If the only way you can refute someone's argument is to mischaracterize it, you've failed.
      That is the argument being made. Your lot is arguing that the pioneers of modern science were Christian, even as you willfully exclude scientists who weren't involved in either physics or astronomy. You apparently seem to think that pioneers of modern science basically amounts to pioneers of modern physics and astronomy. And that's absurd. There are plenty pioneers of modern science who weren't Christian, as soon as one bothers to look at science beyond physics and astronomy (ex: biology).

      If you use pioneers of modern science to mean the pioneers of the methods used in science, then you're still in trouble, since many atheists were the pioneers of the methods used in sciences like biology. There's no excuse for excluding them.

      I'm beginning to think you started this thread because you're not all that bright yourself, and you needed a little boost of self-esteem via association.
      Substance-free insults. Do better.

      By the way, you're making stuff up as well, since I made in the OP I made it quite clear why I started this thread. So there's no reason to dishonestly pretend that there's some other reason. And you still haven't address the false claims you made up about scientific research: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...035#post245035
      Last edited by Jichard; 10-03-2015, 03:24 PM.
      "Instead, we argue, it is necessary to shift the debate from the subject under consideration, instead exposing to public scrutiny the tactics they [denialists] employ and identifying them publicly for what they are."

      Comment


      • Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View Post


        Watching you making a fool of yourself is so entertaining. You want biologist named, from that time period? Ok here you go:

        Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
        Jan Swammerdam
        Peter Artedi
        Leonard da Vinci
        Francesco Redi
        Paracelsus

        These are all people responsible for biology discoveries, from the scientific revolution era.
        And there were pioneers of modern biology, who were atheist.

        Anything else?

        Try again and this time, see if you can admit you're wrong about anything or is your hatred of Christians so powerful that you can't bring yourself to admit to being wrong to a Christian?
        More substance-free lies, as usual.
        "Instead, we argue, it is necessary to shift the debate from the subject under consideration, instead exposing to public scrutiny the tactics they [denialists] employ and identifying them publicly for what they are."

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jichard View Post
          That is the argument being made. Your lot is arguing that the pioneers of modern science were Christian, even as you willfully exclude scientists who weren't involved in either physics or astronomy. You apparently seem to think that pioneers of modern science basically amounts to pioneers of modern physics and astronomy. And that's absurd. There are plenty pioneers of modern science who weren't Christian, as soon as one bothers to look at science beyond physics and astronomy (ex: biology).

          If you use pioneers of modern science to mean the pioneers of the methods used in science, then you're still in trouble, since many atheists were the pioneers of the methods used in sciences like biology. There's no excuse for excluding them.



          Substance-free insults. Do better.

          By the way, you're making stuff up as well, since I made in the OP I made it quite clear why I started this thread. So there's no reason to dishonestly pretend that there's some other reason. And you still haven't address the false claims you made up about scientific research: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...035#post245035
          Sorry, but you are wrong. Modern science (and the modern scientific method) began with physics and astronomy. Hence "pioneers of modern science" DOES amount to "pioneers of physics and astronomy", whether you like it or not. Chemistry came just afterwards, on the coattails of physics. Biology and geology came somewhat later. The "social sciences" (or "soft sciences") came much later.
          Last edited by Kbertsche; 10-03-2015, 07:33 PM.
          "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." – Albert Einstein

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Jichard View Post
            And there were pioneers of modern biology, who were atheist.

            Anything else?
            Quote me where I said they didn't or admit that you made that all up because you're hatred of Christians is your guiding light.

            More substance-free lies, as usual.
            Of course it is a 'lie' because it makes you look like the dishonest jack ass you truly are.
            "The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
            GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy

            Comment


            • Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View Post
              Quote me where I said they didn't
              Quote where I said you claimed that there were not atheist pioneers of science.

              or admit that you made that all up because you're hatred of Christians is your guiding light.
              More insults based on your fabrications about me.

              Of course it is a 'lie' because it makes you look like the dishonest jack ass you truly are.
              More lies about me hating Christians.

              Learn to be Christ-like.
              "Instead, we argue, it is necessary to shift the debate from the subject under consideration, instead exposing to public scrutiny the tactics they [denialists] employ and identifying them publicly for what they are."

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Jichard View Post
                Quote where I said you claimed that there were not atheist pioneers of science.
                Translation: "Crap, I'm wrong again, let me try asking a question rather than just admit that I was wrong again!"

                Anything is better than admitting you're wrong, eh? Go ahead idiot, show where I ever denied atheist haven't made contributions to science.

                More insults based on your fabrications about me.
                Of course it's a fabrication because it makes you look like the jack ass you truly are. If this is wrong, go ahead and please show a single Christian or Christian view point you have agreed with or got along with please. Thanks!

                More lies about me hating Christians.
                Of course it's a 'lie' because it shows you for the jack ass you truly are. If this is a 'lie' though, why do you keep starting fights with every Christian you run into and can't seem to even give Christians credit for anything good and instead take every opportunity to show your hatred, every time your post?

                Learn to be Christ-like.
                Christ-like (Jerkard definition) - "Waa! Please be a door mat so I can walk all over you!"

                What's the problem jack ass, do you not like it when you get the same treatment you have given onto others? You earned it sweety, don't get mad at me because I'm treating you in the same way you treat others.
                "The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
                GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy

                Comment


                • Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View Post
                  Translation: "Crap, I'm wrong again, let me try asking a question rather than just admit that I was wrong again!"

                  Anything is better than admitting you're wrong, eh? Go ahead idiot, show where I ever denied atheist haven't made contributions to science.



                  Of course it's a fabrication because it makes you look like the jack ass you truly are. If this is wrong, go ahead and please show a single Christian or Christian view point you have agreed with or got along with please. Thanks!



                  Of course it's a 'lie' because it shows you for the jack ass you truly are. If this is a 'lie' though, why do you keep starting fights with every Christian you run into and can't seem to even give Christians credit for anything good and instead take every opportunity to show your hatred, every time your post?



                  Christ-like (Jerkard definition) - "Waa! Please be a door mat so I can walk all over you!"

                  What's the problem jack ass, do you not like it when you get the same treatment you have given onto others? You earned it sweety, don't get mad at me because I'm treating you in the same way you treat others.
                  Nothing of substance to respond to there. Just a deeply angry person, making irrational statements.
                  "Instead, we argue, it is necessary to shift the debate from the subject under consideration, instead exposing to public scrutiny the tactics they [denialists] employ and identifying them publicly for what they are."

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Jichard View Post
                    Nothing of substance to respond to there. Just a deeply angry person, making irrational statements.
                    Of course I am because I'm not being the door mat that you wish me to be. Go ahead Jerkard, show a single nice thing you've said to Christians or a Christian since you got here. I can show nice things I've said about atheist, can you do the same for Christians or am I dead right and your hatred of Christians and Christianity, in general, keeps you from doing so?
                    "The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
                    GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy

                    Comment


                    • I am surprised no one mentioned Sir Francis Bacon, he was a devout Anglican, and his ideas played quite the role in the Scientific Revolution.
                      A happy family is but an earlier heaven.
                      George Bernard Shaw

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Catholicity View Post
                        I am surprised no one mentioned Sir Francis Bacon, he was a devout Anglican, and his ideas played quite the role in the Scientific Revolution.
                        I mentioned him briefly earlier in this thread. It has been argued (by Barbour and others) that modern science is based on three ideas which set it apart from Greek and Medieval science: 1) the empiricism of Bacon, 2) the mathematical approach of Kepler, and 3) the theoretical abstraction of Galileo. I think Barbour is correct that until all three of these elements were in place, we really didn't have modern science.

                        All three of these founders of modern science were Christian; Bacon was Anglican, Kepler was Lutheran, and Galileo was Catholic. And all three were fairly devout in their faith, more so than the general public. (Galileo is often wrongly viewed as anti-religious; for evidence of his religious convictions, see his "Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina." Also here.)
                        Last edited by Kbertsche; 10-04-2015, 12:13 AM.
                        "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." – Albert Einstein

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Catholicity View Post
                          I am surprised no one mentioned Sir Francis Bacon, he was a devout Anglican, and his ideas played quite the role in the Scientific Revolution.
                          Yes, indeed.

                          Bacon is putatively the Father of Scientific Method.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by klaus54 View Post
                            Yes, indeed.

                            Bacon is putatively the Father of Scientific Method.
                            Bacon is good for me is good for me


                            I'm always still in trouble again

                            "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                            "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                            "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by klaus54 View Post
                              Yes, indeed.

                              Bacon is putatively the Father of Scientific Method.
                              Actually I will go with Leucretius
                              Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
                              Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
                              But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

                              go with the flow the river knows . . .

                              Frank

                              I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
                                Actually I will go with Leucretius
                                . . . and Archimedes
                                Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
                                Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
                                But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

                                go with the flow the river knows . . .

                                Frank

                                I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by eider, 04-14-2024, 03:22 AM
                                54 responses
                                185 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post eider
                                by eider
                                 
                                Started by Ronson, 04-08-2024, 09:05 PM
                                41 responses
                                166 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Ronson
                                by Ronson
                                 
                                Working...
                                X