Originally posted by Jichard
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Natural Science 301 Guidelines
This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Intelligence and Religiosity
Collapse
X
-
Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostThat is absurd, but it's not the argument being made. If the only way you can refute someone's argument is to mischaracterize it, you've failed.
If you use pioneers of modern science to mean the pioneers of the methods used in science, then you're still in trouble, since many atheists were the pioneers of the methods used in sciences like biology. There's no excuse for excluding them.
I'm beginning to think you started this thread because you're not all that bright yourself, and you needed a little boost of self-esteem via association.
By the way, you're making stuff up as well, since I made in the OP I made it quite clear why I started this thread. So there's no reason to dishonestly pretend that there's some other reason. And you still haven't address the false claims you made up about scientific research: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...035#post245035Last edited by Jichard; 10-03-2015, 03:24 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View Post
Watching you making a fool of yourself is so entertaining. You want biologist named, from that time period? Ok here you go:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
Jan Swammerdam
Peter Artedi
Leonard da Vinci
Francesco Redi
Paracelsus
These are all people responsible for biology discoveries, from the scientific revolution era.
Anything else?
Try again and this time, see if you can admit you're wrong about anything or is your hatred of Christians so powerful that you can't bring yourself to admit to being wrong to a Christian?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jichard View PostThat is the argument being made. Your lot is arguing that the pioneers of modern science were Christian, even as you willfully exclude scientists who weren't involved in either physics or astronomy. You apparently seem to think that pioneers of modern science basically amounts to pioneers of modern physics and astronomy. And that's absurd. There are plenty pioneers of modern science who weren't Christian, as soon as one bothers to look at science beyond physics and astronomy (ex: biology).
If you use pioneers of modern science to mean the pioneers of the methods used in science, then you're still in trouble, since many atheists were the pioneers of the methods used in sciences like biology. There's no excuse for excluding them.
Substance-free insults. Do better.
By the way, you're making stuff up as well, since I made in the OP I made it quite clear why I started this thread. So there's no reason to dishonestly pretend that there's some other reason. And you still haven't address the false claims you made up about scientific research: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...035#post245035Last edited by Kbertsche; 10-03-2015, 07:33 PM."Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." – Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jichard View PostAnd there were pioneers of modern biology, who were atheist.
Anything else?
More substance-free lies, as usual."The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View PostQuote me where I said they didn't
or admit that you made that all up because you're hatred of Christians is your guiding light.
Of course it is a 'lie' because it makes you look like the dishonest jack ass you truly are.
Learn to be Christ-like.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jichard View PostQuote where I said you claimed that there were not atheist pioneers of science.
Anything is better than admitting you're wrong, eh? Go ahead idiot, show where I ever denied atheist haven't made contributions to science.
More insults based on your fabrications about me.
More lies about me hating Christians.
Learn to be Christ-like.
What's the problem jack ass, do you not like it when you get the same treatment you have given onto others? You earned it sweety, don't get mad at me because I'm treating you in the same way you treat others."The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View PostTranslation: "Crap, I'm wrong again, let me try asking a question rather than just admit that I was wrong again!"
Anything is better than admitting you're wrong, eh? Go ahead idiot, show where I ever denied atheist haven't made contributions to science.
Of course it's a fabrication because it makes you look like the jack ass you truly are. If this is wrong, go ahead and please show a single Christian or Christian view point you have agreed with or got along with please. Thanks!
Of course it's a 'lie' because it shows you for the jack ass you truly are. If this is a 'lie' though, why do you keep starting fights with every Christian you run into and can't seem to even give Christians credit for anything good and instead take every opportunity to show your hatred, every time your post?
Christ-like (Jerkard definition) - "Waa! Please be a door mat so I can walk all over you!"
What's the problem jack ass, do you not like it when you get the same treatment you have given onto others? You earned it sweety, don't get mad at me because I'm treating you in the same way you treat others.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jichard View PostNothing of substance to respond to there. Just a deeply angry person, making irrational statements."The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Originally posted by Catholicity View PostI am surprised no one mentioned Sir Francis Bacon, he was a devout Anglican, and his ideas played quite the role in the Scientific Revolution.
All three of these founders of modern science were Christian; Bacon was Anglican, Kepler was Lutheran, and Galileo was Catholic. And all three were fairly devout in their faith, more so than the general public. (Galileo is often wrongly viewed as anti-religious; for evidence of his religious convictions, see his "Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina." Also here.)Last edited by Kbertsche; 10-04-2015, 12:13 AM."Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." – Albert Einstein
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by klaus54 View PostYes, indeed.
Bacon is putatively the Father of Scientific Method.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by klaus54 View PostYes, indeed.
Bacon is putatively the Father of Scientific Method.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostActually I will go with LeucretiusGlendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
Comment