Announcement

Collapse

Theology 201 Guidelines

This is the forum to discuss the spectrum of views within Christianity on God's foreknowledge and election such as Calvinism, Arminianism, Molinism, Open Theism, Process Theism, Restrictivism, and Inclusivism, Christian Universalism and what these all are about anyway. Who is saved and when is/was their salvation certain? How does God exercise His sovereignty and how powerful is He? Is God timeless and immutable? Does a triune God help better understand God's love for mankind?

While this area is for the discussion of these doctrines within historic Christianity, all theists interested in discussing these areas within the presuppositions of and respect for the Christian framework are welcome to participate here. This is not the area for debate between nontheists and theists, additionally, there may be some topics that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream evangelical doctrine that may be more appropriately placed within Comparative Religions 101 Nontheists seeking only theistic participation only in a manner that does not seek to undermine the faith of others are also welcome - but we ask that Moderator approval be obtained beforehand.

Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 or General Theistics 101 forum without such restrictions. Theists who wish to discuss these issues outside the parameters of orthodox Christian doctrine are invited to Unorthodox Theology 201.

Remember, our forum rules apply here as well. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Implications of Locke's Blank Slate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Implications of Locke's Blank Slate

    John Locke taught that when people are born, their minds are a blank slate. This means that people are born with minds that don't have any built-in mental content. There is no innate knowledge that people are born with. Hence, Locke taught that all knowledge comes from experience. Does Locke's viewpoint conflict with the doctrine of original sin?

  • #2
    I would be interested in a quote form Locke on this concept. Such idea may be within a certain narrow context.
    However, my interest here would not particularly be about the support toward a doctrine of original sin.

    Comment


    • #3
      Here is the famous passage from An Essay Concerning Human Understanding:

      "Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper void of all characters, without any ideas. How comes it to be furnished? Whence comes it by that vast store which the busy and boundless fancy of man has painted on it with an almost endless variety? Whence has it all the materials of reason and knowledge? To this I answer, in one word, from experience" ~ Locke, 1690/1947, bk. II, chap. 1, p.26
      That's what
      - She

      Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
      - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

      I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
      - Stephen R. Donaldson

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Jaxb View Post
        John Locke taught that when people are born, their minds are a blank slate. This means that people are born with minds that don't have any built-in mental content. There is no innate knowledge that people are born with. Hence, Locke taught that all knowledge comes from experience. Does Locke's viewpoint conflict with the doctrine of original sin?
        All children are born with the imprint of instinctive behavior imprinted in their brains. Therefore the concept of babies being born with absolute blank slates does not exist...

        Comment


        • #5
          It would seem by our current understand of a baby's development before birth Locke's blank slate would be wrong.
          http://news.sciencemag.org/brain-beh...ize-words-womb
          Last edited by 37818; 11-12-2015, 08:27 AM.
          . . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV

          . . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV

          Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Jaxb View Post
            John Locke taught that when people are born, their minds are a blank slate. This means that people are born with minds that don't have any built-in mental content. There is no innate knowledge that people are born with. Hence, Locke taught that all knowledge comes from experience. Does Locke's viewpoint conflict with the doctrine of original sin?
            Any one who has raised kids knows that they have an innate, and often strong, natural tendency towards selfishness from the get go. You don't have to teach them to misbehave.
            Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jaxb View Post
              John Locke taught that when people are born, their minds are a blank slate. This means that people are born with minds that don't have any built-in mental content. There is no innate knowledge that people are born with. Hence, Locke taught that all knowledge comes from experience. Does Locke's viewpoint conflict with the doctrine of original sin?
              Before an elaboration is given, what do you understand by Original Sin?
              Ladino, Guatemalan, Hispanic, and Latin, but foremostly, Christian.
              As of the 1st of December, 2020, officially anointed as this:

              "Seinfeld had its Soup Nazi. Tweb has its Taco Nazi." - Rogue06 , https://theologyweb.com/campus/forum...e3#post1210559

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Andius View Post
                Before an elaboration is given, what do you understand by Original Sin?
                The inherited guilt and corrupt nature that we receive from Adam when we are born.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Jaxb View Post
                  The inherited guilt and corrupt nature that we receive from Adam when we are born.
                  And how is that so?
                  . . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV

                  . . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV

                  Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 37818 View Post
                    And how is that so?
                    The corrupt nature yes, the inherited guilt I'm not so sure about.
                    Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jaxb View Post
                      The inherited guilt and corrupt nature that we receive from Adam when we are born.
                      Originally posted by seer View Post
                      The corrupt nature yes, the inherited guilt I'm not so sure about.
                      Again, how is this so?
                      . . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV

                      . . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV

                      Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by 37818 View Post
                        Again, how is this so?
                        As far as the corrupt nature, I suspect that is because God's Spirit has been kicked out of the human heart. And without the controlling effect of God's indwelling Spirit we tend towards following our animal nature. That is why we need to be "born again." Or regenerated.
                        Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

                        Comment

                        widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
                        Working...
                        X