Thread: Mark 16:9
-
June 17th 2012, 10:15 PM #106
Re: Mark 16:9
rs,
One little note:
While John says, "...it was still dark, the other three Gospels declare that it was, "...early in the......morning....".
Bless
-
June 24th 2012, 04:29 AM #107
Re: Mark 16:9
Daniel7:14.
re: “...permit me to express it in this manner...”
OK, just so you realize that your comment - “ with the Sunday morning resurrection, it would be 8 days from his triumphal entry” - was incorrect.
-
June 24th 2012, 08:52 PM #108
-
June 25th 2012, 09:04 PM #109
Re: Mark 16:9
Geo,
You are correct. I have been outdoors "early" of the morning, and while I watched that first light begin to appear in the Eastern sky...........I looked to the West and saw that stars were still visible against the night sky. John"s account is for those who see the glass "half-empty" (or vice-versa). All the Gospels agree.
Yet, the reason for "light" being necessary was so that it would be the 3rd day. As you look in Genesis you will note that the "day" became complete with the on-set of the second component, which was "day" (light).
"...the evening and the........Morning.........were the 3rd day..."
RS,
Sometimes when people say something.....not everyone understands. Having the opportunity to state the same thing...another way...often leads to better comprehension. That is what I attempted to do in my last response to you...present the point another way. Apparently you have missed both my explanations.
I shall try again.
The "evening" began a...NEW...day. You can look at Genesis and see that the "days" that were created, began with the evening. You can also note that the Sabbath began with the "evening". You will also see that the observance of the Passover began with the "evening", "...and all Israel shall kill it in the...evening".
The...triumphal entry...occured during the day, which was the 10th day of the month (Ex. 12:3). When the evening arrived later....that began a "new" day, Mk. 11:11. From that point in time forward.....it would be 7 days until his resurrection. If from that time of the evening (Mk. 11:11) forward is 7 days........the events (his entry) that proceeded that evening....would have to occur one day prior. Thus, it would be the 8th day, from his triumphal entry until his resurrection.
Where you may be missing the point is in the "new" day timeline.
YES! Christ did enter Jerusalem earlier that day, and we, in our society count the event of that evening as the "same" day. Yet, with their "day" beginning in the evening, Christ standing in the Temple, was the "day" that ...followed...his triumphal entry. Hence, it was 7 days from that point (Mk. 11:11) until his resurrection...but...it was 8 days from his triumphal entry (one day earlier).
This is why there is much confusion over identifying the 3 days and nights that Christ was in the heart of the Earth!
Thursday evening begins the timeline: It gives us 3 evenings and 3 mornings, with his resurrection occuring Sunday morning (early)...............BUT...........it is still the 3rd day, see Lk 24:21.
Interesting that Christ could be in the heart of the Earth 3 days and 3 nights......yet rise the "3rd" day.
That is the "provision" that makes it all "hold" together.
You can see now that I did not mis-speak, but rather that I explained it poorly to where you did not understand.
-
June 25th 2012, 09:19 PM #110
Re: Mark 16:9
(CONT')
So, yes it was the same "calendar" day, according to us, but it entails...two...days during the time of Christ.
As you "begin your count" backwards from his resurrection day, Sunday, first day of the week, count back 3 mornings and 3 evenings, you will arrive at Thursday evening. As you "count" the 10th day of the month with his triumphal entry.....until the 14th day of the month...you will arrive at Thursday.
There are 40 days from resurrection to ascension;
There are 42 days from crucifixion to ascension;
There are 50 days from resurrection to the giving of the Holy Ghost;
There are 5o years to Jubilee;
There are 52 days from crucifixion to the giving of the Holy Ghost;
There are 52 days to the rebuilding of the "wall" (Neh. 6:15);
It is all by design, it is all connected; and........Christ.....is the "common denominator"!
Bless,
Dan
-
July 1st 2012, 12:20 PM #111
Re: Mark 16:9
There is no precedence for a 1st day church week.
ανασταςG450 [G5631] δεG1161 NOW HAVING RISEN πρωιG4404 EARLY "THE" πρωτηG4413 FIRST "DAY" σαββατουG4521 OF THE WEEK εφανηG5316 [G5648] HE APPEARED πρωτονG4412 FIRST μαριαG3137 TO MARY τηG3588 THE μαγδαληνηG3094 MAGDALENE, αφG575 FROM ηςG3739 WHOM εκβεβληκειG1544 [G5715] HE HAD CAST OUT επταG2033 SEVEN δαιμονιαG1140 DEMONS.
And σαββατου means "of the seventh" in greek. They also gathered rarely on the pentacost, see the quarterdecimian contraversyThere is so much negativity that seems to hold the universe together.
-
July 1st 2012, 06:49 PM #112
Re: Mark 16:9
It actually means, literally, "of seven", the first of which means the first day of seven days, which is the week ending in the Sabbath, or seven... In the Church, we call it the Eighth Day... Which is Sunday... Which is the first day of the new week that begins with a Holy Day, and ends in the Sabbath...
Arsenios
-
July 1st 2012, 07:13 PM #113
Re: Mark 16:9
There is so much negativity that seems to hold the universe together.
-
July 1st 2012, 07:51 PM #114
Re: Mark 16:9
It actually means, literally, "of seven", the first of which means the first day of seven days, which is the week ending in the Sabbath, or seven... In the Church, we call it the Eighth Day... Which is Sunday... Which is the first day of the new week that begins with a Holy Day, and ends in the Sabbath...
Arsenios
Nobody said there was... Are you ok?
Israelites do not bury bodies on the Sabbath...It is saturday night, and they have to bury a body according to Israelite custom.
It means the first DAY - Ask any Greek... Literally the first of seven - And very early in the pre-dawn hours... At the break of day... First light, as we used to say in North Dakota...The text πρωτηι means he was the first to wake up during that night.
Arsenios
-
July 4th 2012, 11:22 PM #115
Re: Mark 16:9
Geo,
Thank you for the "background" information, it always helps to solidify the position we lean towards.
The morning resurrection of Christ would duplicate the first day of Creation. That would be the introduction of "light" into the world. After all the sun and stars were not created until the 4th day. Col. 1:16 informs us that; "...all things were made by him and.......FOR......him..." Why would we be surprised that Christ would "introduce" Creation, in the manner in which he did, which would reflect his redemptive work, completed on that first day of the week?
It may have something to do with the...unchanging...nature of God. Christ was that "light" (existant) of the world during Creation, on the first day, and he would be that "light" (redemptive) of the world with his resurrection: also on the first day of the week.
Bless,
Dan
-
The following tWebber says Amen to Daniel7:14 for this useful Post:
-
August 28th 2012, 07:33 PM #116
Re: Mark 16:9
Since it's been awhile, perhaps someone new looking in will know of an author.
-
August 28th 2012, 08:38 PM #117
- Join Date
- October 30th, 2006
- Posts
- 2,377
- Blog Entries
- 3
- Mentioned
- 2 Post(s)
Male - ArminianRe: Mark 16:9
Oh, no... not this thread again...
-
August 28th 2012, 08:46 PM #118
- Join Date
- October 22nd, 2004
- Posts
- 18,180
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
Undisclosed - WiccanRe: Mark 16:9
Perhaps it's time to acknowledge that you were incorrect. I am not aware of any published author who cites Mark 16:9 as their reason for worshiping on Sunday.
On the other hand, Sunday worship probably goes back to the writing of the Didache, the Apocalypse of John, and definitely goes back to Irenaeus and Justin Martyr.Life sometimes needs to be grabbed by the throat and beaten with a lead pipe. ~ Sir Longpost, a good friend of mine.
-----
-
August 29th 2012, 04:56 PM #119
-
August 29th 2012, 05:02 PM #120
Re: Mark 16:9
There is so much negativity that seems to hold the universe together.
Similar Threads
-
Debate Discussion: The gospel of Mark was written by Mark JPHolding v. chsalvia
By themuzicman in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 16Last Post: September 8th 2004, 05:46 PM -
Gym Debate: Mark was written by Mark, JPHolding v. chsalvia
By themuzicman in forum Advanced Debate 301Replies: 0Last Post: June 7th 2004, 03:51 PM















































































Quote



It's not about the nail.
Today, 12:13 AM in Fraternity