Preserved for 520 million years?!?

[Jorge]

Actually there are numerous things that could falsify evolution. Probably the most famous example is attributed to J.B.S. Haldane which is finding the remains of a rabbit embedded in Precambrian rocks. Finding a fish with feathers would also do it. Talk Origins has a long list on their website.

The fact is that to date nothing has come along which has falsified evolution despite a century and a half of many people working frantically to do so. This is powerful testimony to just how strong evolutionary theory is.

Since you hang around with so many nitwit, bird-brain Evos you've acquired the view that everyone is the same. That's a really wrong view - I mean, it's so bad that "it's not even wrong".

I have witnessed many times in my lifetime Evolutionists constantly moving the goalposts through semantic manipulation, ad hoc rescuing hypotheses, selective data mining, suppressing data, denying data... etc. It's gotten to the point where it will take Christ Himself to come down and say, "Evolutionism is anti-biblical garbage ... You all got that? ... G-a-r-b-a-g-e!!!"

Heck, even then I can see the Fanatical Evo Diehards (a.k.a, the FED)
reply, "I don't believe you; prove to us that you are Jesus Christ!!"

You remain clueless, R06.

Jorge

[Jorge]

Really? Apparently you never heard of all the fossils from the Cambrian period and earlier that have been excavated and documented.

For instance, here is an image taken through an electron microscope of Eokinorhynchus rarus that is dated at 530 myo
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12569[/ATTACH]

Here is another 530 myo fossil of a creature called Fuxianhuia protensa
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12570[/ATTACH]

Here are some of a 540 myo creature named Conotubus hemiannulatus
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12571[/ATTACH]

Since we've now entered the Precambrian, here is a picture of Dickinsonia which is dated at over 555 myo
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12572[/ATTACH]

And here is one of a creature known as Charniodiscus which lived some 560 mya.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12573[/ATTACH]



Once again Jorge proceeds to shoot himself in the foot after wedging said foot deeply in his mouth and will soon start trying to blame everyone else

Both you and Beagle Boy must be high from smoking lint taken out of Obama's belly button.

I mean, even you critters can't be stupid enough - or dishonest enough - to actually believe or insinuate that I'm not aware of fossils that are ALLEGEDLY hundreds of millions or billions of years old, right?

The OP is about stuff like this (underlined below) and similar taken from the article:



But, see, for Evolutionism NOTHING is impossible. If something is found that is "impossible" then something will be magically conjured out of thin air. As long as Evolutionism is preserved, that is all that matters. One of my favorite examples of this for decades has been Punctuated Equilibrium. WOW - talk about a major-league con job!!!

Then the Dodos go out and call that "science".

Yeah, right! Hey, there's this bridge in Brooklyn that I can sell you. Ya interested?

Jorge

[Roy]

Second, the fossils appear to have been buried by a flood

Since these fossils are of marine organisms that lived on the seabed, this must have been an underwater flood. Spectacular.

[rogue06]

Both you and Beagle Boy must be high from smoking lint taken out of Obama's belly button.

Once again Jorge proceeds to shoot himself in the foot after wedging said foot deeply in his mouth and will soon start trying to blame everyone else

I mean, even you critters can't be stupid enough - or dishonest enough - to actually believe or insinuate that I'm not aware of fossils that are ALLEGEDLY hundreds of millions or billions of years old, right?

You are the one who started a post with an imaginary "evo" proclaiming that the existence of fossils 520 myo was "IMPOSSIBLE!!!"

The OP is about stuff like this (underlined below) and similar taken from the article:

This is obviously a remarkable discovery and it is not surprising that it would generate doubt over whether the material was correctly identified. Moreover please note that Xiaoya Ma does not say that anyone ever actually said it was impossible, but rather "They basically saidFuxianhuia protensa (the name of the ancient long extinct arthropod) appear to have been remarkably dense (it should be noted that extant arthropods have the densest brains and nervous system tissue of any creature) and as Nicholas Strausfeld, co-author of the paper describing the discovery, has said "F. protensa's tissue density appears to have made all the difference."

But, see, for Evolutionism NOTHING is impossible. If something is found that is "impossible" then something will be magically conjured out of thin air. As long as Evolutionism is preserved, that is all that matters. One of my favorite examples of this for decades has been Punctuated Equilibrium. WOW - talk about a major-league con job!!!

Impotent bitterness won't reshape the facts. There are a number of things that can falsify evolution and I provided just two examples. You're just mad that evolutionary theory has successfully met every challenge thrown at it.

[Roy]

But Fuxianhuia protensa ... appear to have been remarkably dense

Denser than Jorge?

[rogue06]

Denser than Jorge?

Jorge's brain may have calcified in his skull

[Truthseeker]

Jorge, I don't understand. Perhaps evolutionists made a mistake in ruling out fossilized neuro-stuff as impossible. It seems to me that alone should not falsify the rest of current evolution??

[HMS_Beagle]

Jorge's brain may have calcified in his skull

If Jorge's head fosslizes after he dies some future paleontologist millions of years from now may indeed find his fossilized brain. Of course they'll need a scanning electron microscope to see it.

[Jorge]

You are the one who started a post with an imaginary "evo" proclaiming that the existence of fossils 520 myo was "IMPOSSIBLE!!!"


This is obviously a remarkable discovery and it is not surprising that it would generate doubt over whether the material was correctly identified. Moreover please note that Xiaoya Ma does not say that anyone ever actually said it was impossible, but rather "They basically saidFuxianhuia protensa (the name of the ancient long extinct arthropod) appear to have been remarkably dense (it should be noted that extant arthropods have the densest brains and nervous system tissue of any creature) and as Nicholas Strausfeld, co-author of the paper describing the discovery, has said "F. protensa's tissue density appears to have made all the difference."


Impotent bitterness won't reshape the facts. There are a number of things that can falsify evolution and I provided just two examples. You're just mad that evolutionary theory has successfully met every challenge thrown at it.

Thanks for sealing my case, R06.

Your Honor, I rest my case.

Jorge

[Jorge]

Jorge, I don't understand. Perhaps evolutionists made a mistake in ruling out fossilized neuro-stuff as impossible. It seems to me that alone should not falsify the rest of current evolution??

That's right, it doesn't. Evolutionism is falsified by a convergence of multiple evidences.

Two of those evidences are my particular strong suits: information and thermodynamics. I regard those two fields as definitively falsifying Evolution all by themselves.

Yet, like trying to nail jellyfish to a wall, Evolutionists slither out of any and all arguments often times with the most underhanded tactics you could ever imagine. I've listed a few: semantic manipulation, creating ad hoc rescuing hypotheses, selective data mining, shelving and ignoring data that hurts their cause, ... and so on. Punctuated Equilibrium, by two of the Evo-Prophets, is a classic example of this.

Truthfully, I've learned a lot of the dark side of human nature by observing these vermin doing their thing. I've also had a lot of fun rattling their cage and watching the screeching and howling that follows.

Evos are sooooo easy prey that sometimes I feel downright guilty of torturing them.

Jorge

[HMS_Beagle]

That's right, it doesn't. Evolutionism is falsified by a convergence of multiple evidences.

Two of those evidences are my particular strong suits: information and thermodynamics. I regard those two fields as definitively falsifying Evolution all by themselves.

LOL! That's why the last five Nobel Prizes in the life sciences have been awarded to "Dr" Jorge Fraudnandez, for his iron-clad falsification of evolutionary theory.

Oh, wait...

[Roy]

Two of those evidences are my particular strong suits: information and thermodynamics.

Jorge's strong suit is not only short but he's missing the k.

[Jorge]

Jorge's strong suit is not only short but he's missing the k.

At least you are consistent.

Except that your consistency here is a bad thing - a REALLY bad thing.
Kind'a like consistently soiling your shorts.

Carry on, Rrrrroy ... keep letting the world know what you're made of.

Jorge

[Jorge]

LOL! That's why the last five Nobel Prizes in the life sciences have been awarded to "Dr" Jorge Fraudnandez, for his iron-clad falsification of evolutionary theory.

Oh, wait...

... Move along folks, it's just a Loser seeking some attention.

Jorge

[rogue06]

That's right, it doesn't. Evolutionism is falsified by a convergence of multiple evidences.

Two of those evidences are my particular strong suits: information and thermodynamics. I regard those two fields as definitively falsifying Evolution all by themselves.

Are you one of those ignorant nutcases that claims evolution violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics? Don't you think physicists would have realized that?