Perhaps you should look and realize you're only engaging with prior probability and not looking at the probability after all the data is taken in.
All you've got really is Hume's argument and for that you need to read Earman and then read Keener and see how many people all over the world are reporting miracles.
All you've got really is Hume's argument and for that you need to read Earman and then read Keener and see how many people all over the world are reporting miracles.
Comment