Is the Earth Flat? - Some Evidence Presented

[Yttrium]

Show me the error. It should be easy.

For the thrusters? You push stuff out one end, you move in the opposite direction. It's a direct application of Newton's Third Law. It's just that simple. We do it all the time.

You keep trying to complicate it. Don't do that.

[Roy]

Show me the error. It should be easy.

It is easy. Or rather it would be easy if you weren't completely incapable of understanding the simplest of concepts.

Satellite thruster rockets work exactly the same way as a released balloon.

Cue complete failure to understand or accept the obvious in 3... 2... 1...

[klaus54]

Show me the error. It should be easy.

JM

Your errorS have been shown multiple times.

At this point I have to conclude that your are seriously mentally ill, or (as per Sparko) a poor excuse for a troll.

[klaus54]

Just tell me Jim.

Please.

JM

He HAS, Troll -- many, many times.

[Sparko]

How does the speed of dark compare with the speed of light?

Maybe JohnM can work out the maths for the speed of dark in the Magick Aether?

Is the instrument used to project onto the Moon and Sun called a "dark" instead of a "light"?

dark is caused by particles of anti-photons called darkons. its speed is negative 187K miles/second.

[klaus54]

Jim has no answer to the problem of steering in space. He will never admit it of course.

JM

Jim has answered you correctly many times.

You will never admit he has.

Geo has failed.

Flat-Earthism has failed.

p.s. Nelson_Ha-Ha.jpg

[Sparko]

The interior light source could be designed by God to partially illuminate the moon during its phases.

You think the FE model is complicated and therefore a joke. Maybe you are right.

Lets put your thesis to the test with the Helio model which says sun light is reflected off the moon. The suns reflected light off the moon is intense, yet the moon is composed of dull moon rock and dust and in a concave shape. Such composition and moon shape points to light from the sun being both absorbed by the moons surface and/or dispersed form the moons surface. Yet we see the moon light, both bright and not dispersed from the lunar surface.

The Helio model sees the dull, concave moon surface which points to lunar light absorption and dispersion, yet the model has to account for lunar light that is strong and focused (not dispersed) when seen from the earth.

I think the Helio model is a collection of ad hoc physics that requires faith in modern science.

JM

the moon is not concave. and it is not dull as you can see.

so now god has to have variable lights in the moon to account for phases and eclipses. and i suppose the sun does too to account for eclipses and night time. do you realize how absurd that is? why would God want to fool people into thinking the earth is round and rotating and the moon just reflects sunlight. you are making god into a liar. someone who purposefully fools his creation with tricks and then punishes them for believing the tricks.

the simplest explanation is that the earth is a sphere, it rotates and it orbits the sun. and God gave us brains to figure it out and he is not a liar.

[klaus54]

dark is caused by particles of anti-photons called darkons. its speed is negative 187K miles/second.

Does Satan communicate via Darkons similar to the manner in which Mormons communicate with Kolob via Tachyons?

[Sparko]

Does Satan communicate via Darkons similar to the manner in which Mormons communicate with Kolob via Tachyons?

I dont know about satan but the sith use darkons all the time.

[lilpixieofterror]

Your errorS have been shown multiple times.

At this point I have to conclude that your are seriously mentally ill, or (as per Sparko) a poor excuse for a troll.

I go with the seriously mentally ill excuse myself. Might explain why he disappears for months at a time too. Those are the times the meds start kicking in.

[JohnMartin]

Please don't lie John - the answer has been given to you over and over. Simple reaction motors which generate thrust. The same kind that launch the rockets in the first place. You refuse to admit that is the answer, but that does not change the fact that is the answer, and it does not change the fact you've been told that over and over. So to say I have no answer is a lie John. Stop Lying John.

Jim

So what do these thrusters thrust against in space? Show how space is both a vacuum and thrusters steer pods in space in accord with Newtons three laws.

When I stated you had no answer, I was referring to our recent conversation in which you refused to give a direct answer. I did not lie.

JM

[JohnMartin]

For the thrusters? You push stuff out one end, you move in the opposite direction. It's a direct application of Newton's Third Law. It's just that simple. We do it all the time.

You keep trying to complicate it. Don't do that.

There is nothing to thrust against in space.

JM

[JohnMartin]

the moon is not concave. and it is not dull as you can see.

so now god has to have variable lights in the moon to account for phases and eclipses. and i suppose the sun does too to account for eclipses and night time. do you realize how absurd that is? why would God want to fool people into thinking the earth is round and rotating and the moon just reflects sunlight. you are making god into a liar. someone who purposefully fools his creation with tricks and then punishes them for believing the tricks.

the simplest explanation is that the earth is a sphere, it rotates and it orbits the sun. and God gave us brains to figure it out and he is not a liar.

No answer to the problem of reflected light from the sun.

JM

[Sparko]

No answer to the problem of reflected light from the sun.

JM

stop ignoring your problem of no eclipse in the flat earth and no sunlight reaching the moon if the sun acts like a spotlight.

there is no problem in the round earth theory of reflected sunlight. sun light reaches moon and reflects off. no problem. you can go outside and see for yourself. use a telescope and you can even see light and shadows on the craters and mountains showing where the sunlight hits them. obviously they are not lit from inside. just look for yourself.

[JohnMartin]

No, it shows you're a nutcase that doesn't understand basic science.



Again nutcase, your 'experiment' wouldn't show that anyway because it is based on your own ignorance of gravity and how it works.




Again nut job, your 'experiment' wouldn't show that anyway because you keep forgetting about the earth's gravity being much stronger than the table's gravity. Here's the problem, you're a nutcase that can't admit he's wrong about anything and tries to cover up his own stupidity by reasoning that makes no sense, to anybody, but himself.



AKA you're a nut job that doesn't know what he's talking about.



Wrong again nut job, keep trying.

All this has been explained before. The Helio model remains invalidated.

JM