Doubting John: He Still Lies Today!

[Rayado]

What I find even more hilarious is that he's so obsessed with you that he actually took to this method of trying to smear you.

After all he's tried here nothing surprises me anymore.

[Little Shepherd]

Ever since I got into news feeds, I've though Tekton could use one. It's harder to create one if you code the site by hand though. A lot of blog and content management software will automatically create feeds for you. TWeb has feeds for each forum and also for the blogs.

At the moment, due to something in the software that Ciris and Boom haven't worked around, you can only get feeds to forums that are viewable by unregistered guests. If they can't see the forum, you can't get the feed. I thought something was wrong when I was just getting into RSS and brought it up, and Ciris explained things to me. He says that due to increasing demand(in other words, me ) he might look into figuring out a work-around. I guess I was the first person to say something . . .

[Rayado]

I guess this also makes him a flaming hypocrite since he arrogantly accused Tophet of being a sockpuppet...

[Doubting John]

Technically, I didn't lie.

Prove to me I did.

Besides, it doesn't matter that you know I started the Blog. I don't care. People will still visit there regardless, and I will continue sending people there.

You are the dishonest one.

[Rayado]

[Meta Knight]

That has to have been a joke

[Meta Knight]

Moderators, please leave these links intact despite use of my real name, etc. It''ll be moot in a few weeks anyway.

Eh? Why's that? Getting your name changed?

[Doubting John]

The "here" leads to this blog site, which is exhibit 2:

Exhibit 2: http://jpholding.blogspot.com/

Notice that there's no name attached to this blog, no one who takes responsibility for it whatsoever. Yet DJ says he "recently noticed" this blog. Hmmm. Note also this quote:

Exhibit 3:

http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4637087.../posts/default

Hmmmm.....this seems to be some kind of source code and material for the site noted as Exhibit 2...look, the very same quote appears:



And my goodness....whose name do we find there in the code?



My my my my my my my my.....Doubting John is SUCH a liar. And a very stupid one, too.


Back shortly with another surprise for his bunch.

Funny, when I go there I don't find the link. Is it broken?

And why is it you asked the moderators to ignore the fact that the blog lists your real name, when it also reveals my name? Why is it they will allow a link to my real name and only allow a link to your real name when you allow it?

I do not allow it, and I ask that the moderators stick to their policy about privacy and moderate all such links wherever they find them.

[Cynic Sage]

Technically, I didn't lie.

Prove to me I did.

Besides, it doesn't matter that you know I started the Blog. I don't care. People will still visit there regardless, and I will continue sending people there.

You are the dishonest one.

So which is it, DJ, Multiple Personality Disorder or Alzheimer's?

[Rayado]

Funny, when I go there I don't find the link. Is it broken?

Tampering with the evidence, are we?

[Dee Dee Warren]

That second link is pretty irrelevant anyways at this point. DJ pretends like he "just noticed" something in May that he himself authored in March.

Hey, I "just noticed" this great forum called theologyweb.com.

[Doubting John]

That second link is pretty irrelevant anyways at this point. DJ pretends like he "just noticed" something in May that he himself authored in March.

Hey, I "just noticed" this great forum called theologyweb.com.

Get the quote right, it said "recently noticed."

And what about the other link and this:

-
<feed>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637087862117528188</id>
<updated>2007-05-26T09:37:42.003-07:00</updated>
<title type="text">J.P. Holding</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jpholding.blogspot.com/"/>
<link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://jpholding.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4637087862117528188/posts/default"/>
-
<author>
<name>John W. Loftus</name>


This is a place for double standards, correct? Doing as Holding does, correct?

[Meta Knight]

Get the quote right, it said "recently noticed."

And what about the other link and this:

-
<feed>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637087862117528188</id>
<updated>2007-05-26T09:37:42.003-07:00</updated>
<title type="text">J.P. Holding</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jpholding.blogspot.com/"/>
<link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://jpholding.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4637087862117528188/posts/default"/>
-
<author>
<name>John W. Loftus</name>


This is a place for double standards, correct? Doing as Holding does, correct?

Holding links to himself as a corrborating opinion?

[Dee Dee Warren]

Get the quote right, it said "recently noticed."

Okay let me revise my post and see if it makes you look any better....

That second link is pretty irrelevant anyways at this point. DJ pretends like he "recently noticed" something in May that he himself authored in March.

Hey, I "recently noticed" this great forum called theologyweb.com.

Nope. It makes you look worse.

As far as your rest, take it up with the forum staff. I don't do any work around here.

I am waiting with baited breath how it isn't a lie that you "recently noticed" something that you yourself created. Prior to your May discovery, do you forget about it that you had to "notice" it. Did it catch you by surprise?

Hey, I hear Detective Furhman said he "recently noticed" a black glove.

[Dee Dee Warren]

Holding links to himself as a corrborating opinion?

Or does he create sockpuppet sites and then act as if it something he "recently noticed"?

Hey, I hear Holding "recently noticed" some cartoon site called tektoonics.

I "recently noticed" this great commentary on Matthew 24 at http://www.preteristsite.com/plain/warrenend.html