Originally posted by Mr Minder

Let's hope that you really are going to have a baby.

Oh. My. Goodness. Maybe this can turn out to be like what it would have been if Darth Vader would have raised Luke himself!

I will raise the child as my secret apprentice and we will overthrow the Emperor.

Originally posted by Darth Ovious

I will raise the child as my secret apprentice and we will overthrow the Emperor.

Just share the video of your dance off ok?
http://video.adultswim.com/robot-chi...-son-dance-off

Originally posted by Darth Ovious

I will raise the child as my secret apprentice and we will overthrow the Emperor.

Barack Obama?

Originally posted by Mr Minder

Barack Obama?

I think you mean Gordon Brown.

Matt of MandM blog takes DJ to task for using his name in vain.

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/mandm...-psalm-14.html

(Screwball to DJ for thinking Matt was agreeing with him and for his entire argument, Anti-screwball to Matt for the good work)

Anti-screwball for some great posts by Mattsterpiece over here.

Ed Turner aka Manic Street Preacher aka New Atheist Parrot has banned me from his blog and deleted all of my devastating refutations.

Link

Little does he know that my comments survive through Google cache.

I'm considering starting a just for fun blog to refute his posts and I've already written a Tertullian-esque intro for Mr. Turner.

Fun with Sheezy retards:
Me:

1. Either there is a God or there is not.
2. There is either a way to know whether God exists or there is not.
3. Premise 2 does not imply that there is a way to prove God exists.
4. If 2 is false, all religions are just opinion.
5. Some religions make claims that can be tested by either science, history, or both.
6. said religions also come to a logical conclusion that God exists upon validation.


Here's a long enough logic chain (which we all know is not just opinion because the basic premises are facts) which should be sufficient to disprove that statement [that religion is nothing but opinion].

Dr mettic's stunning logic?

But ultimately, until something is proven true, it is false.
God as not been proven to excuse, so until then it's false
Using your logic (see number 4) that would make all religions opinion.

opinion gaems

No, dumbass, you've conceded my point... by supposing a system by which we can come to a conclusion about God's existence!

Now that's what I call a perfect argument from ignorance.

Warning!: The following contains profanity, criminal levels of stupidity, and a huge boatload of FAIL.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/foru...167295#4470928

Here's the situation: The Pope calls on people of the world to take care of the planet and pushes world leaders to actually DO something about the current state of our planet.

The anti-theist response on The Escapist?

Nothing but vitriol and hate. Not once do they discuss what he said. Not once do they acknowledge the truth of his words. Hell, the arguments that do occur have NOTHING to do with the environment at all.

One user said it best:

This thread is one of the most bizarre things I have seen. They guy said "hey everyone, the planet is in danger". But just because he is the Pope we have an out-pouring of snide passive aggressive remarks.

Originally posted by wildrow12

Warning!: The following contains profanity, criminal levels of stupidity, and a huge boatload of FAIL.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/foru...167295#4470928

Here's the situation: The Pope calls on people of the world to take care of the planet and pushes world leaders to actually DO something about the current state of our planet.

The anti-theist response on The Escapist?

Nothing but vitriol and hate. Not once do they discuss what he said. Not once do they acknowledge the truth of his words. Hell, the arguments that do occur have NOTHING to do with the environment at all.

One user said it best:

Sexual deviance (which is the driving factor behind most atheists) does serious damage to the mind, body, and soul. Notice that the driving force behind the hatred is the ignorance over Pope Benedict's birth control comments in Africa. Atheists have blindly repeated this junk since the comments were first made....comments which they didn't read.....comments which were backed up by one of the leading experts on the topic, Dr. Edward Green.

Screwball to cracked for their article today:
"7 books we lost to history that would have changed the world"

Intro statement:

Obviously we'll never know what great books have been lost to time, but we have clues on some of them, and what those clues tell us is mind-boggling, and a little bit depressing. If you could make a library out of just books that didn't survive, you'd have a collection of some of the best freaking books ever written.

What's their first listing?
#7. The Gospel of Eve, by Unknown
Their last?
#1. The Book of the Wars of the Lord, by God(?)

Ok, #1 does sound awesome.

LDSTrue digs for some gold and comes up with this:

Originally posted by LDSTrue

http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showpost.php?p=2882208&postcount=67

I’m sure you have faith that your car will get you to work. Tomorrow, let’s try this experiment, get up and get all ready for work, get in your car without the key and sit there with full faith that your car will deliver you to work. You'll soon discover that your faith alone will not get your car started and you on your way to work.

What went wrong? Was something wrong with your faith or was it something wrong with your expectations and the way you were applying your faith.

Your faith alone that your car will get you to work leaves your car dead in it tracts and it will never deliver you to work on faith alone. A lot has to transpire correctly for your car to start and run sufficiently to deliver you to work beginning with inserting the key and turning it in the ignition. Jesus and His Apostles say the same principals apply with His gospel within His Church!

Maybe it's a bit out of date, but I was reading this post
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014630.html

And it said one of the single best refutations I've ever read:

Yes. The atheists... encounter something in the universe that is objectionable,--evil or suffering or ugliness--and they say that this disproves the existence of God. But if they believe that evil and suffering and ugliness prove the non-existence of God, then they are also saying that goodness and happiness and beauty prove the existence of God.

Yeah, maybe it's been said before but I wanted to make sure it was shared.

A reply to Yo Lunch - even dead guys pwn you.

“Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important.” C. S. Lewis

Note to self: lost_layman, first Platinum candidate for TWeb n00b, 2010 (he qualifies since he just signed on less than a year ago).