Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

IG report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by JimL View Post
    They are supposed to be independent, you dope!
    "Independent" means they're supposed to cut the president out of the loop while keeping Congress informed and leaking to their friends in the liberal media?
    Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
    But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
    Than a fool in the eyes of God


    From "Fools Gold" by Petra

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
      "Independent" means they're supposed to cut the president out of the loop while keeping Congress informed and leaking to their friends in the liberal media?
      Yes, when the IG gets a whistleblower complaint about abuse of power within the administration, such as Atkinson received, you cut the president out. That's why they are independent! Dictators don't like that idea.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
        Yes, when the IG gets a whistleblower complaint about abuse of power within the administration, such as Atkinson received, you cut the president out. That's why they are independent! Dictators don't like that idea.
        So they're really not independent; rather, they're beholden to Congress.
        Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
        But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
        Than a fool in the eyes of God


        From "Fools Gold" by Petra

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
          So they're really not independent; rather, they're beholden to Congress.
          Well yeah, it's called Congressional oversight, and that is why IG's were put in place in the first place. But ultimately they're beholden to the American people. If they were beholden to the President, then there wouldn't be any point to the position.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
            Well yeah, it's called Congressional oversight, and that is why IG's were put in place in the first place.
            Which is to say that all of your talk about them being "independent" is a load of crap.

            Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
            If they were beholden to the President...
            The president is their boss. That's why he can fire them, dippy.
            Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
            But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
            Than a fool in the eyes of God


            From "Fools Gold" by Petra

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
              Which is to say that all of your talk about them being "independent" is a load of crap.
              Reporting to Congress, which is bipartisan, is the responsibility of the IGs. OIGs serve to assist congressional oversight of the executive branch which is why Congress created the positions in the first place.

              The president is their boss. That's why he can fire them, dippy.
              Yes, I suspect that when creating the positions of IGs, Congress didn't take Trump and his dictitorial tendencies into account. Hopefully they'll correct that error.
              Last edited by JimL; 04-09-2020, 11:02 PM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
                Reporting to Congress, which is bipartisan, is the responsibility of the IGs. OIGs serve to assist congressional oversight of the executive branch which is why Congress created the positions in the first place.
                Which is to say that all your talk about them being "independent" is a load of crap.

                Since when does "oversight" imply that they should go out of their way to keep the president in the dark and leak juicy tidbits to the media?

                Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
                Yes, I suspect that when creating the positions of IGs, Congress didn't take Trump and his dictitorial tendencies.
                Do you always use begged when you debate?
                Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                Than a fool in the eyes of God


                From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                  Which is to say that all your talk about them being "independent" is a load of crap.

                  Since when does "oversight" imply that they should go out of their way to keep the president in the dark and leak juicy tidbits to the media?


                  Do you always use begged when you debate?
                  The president was not in the dark, as you say. The information from the survey of the hospitals was a detailed version of what we have been reading on the news.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by simplicio View Post
                    The president was not in the dark, as you say. The information from the survey of the hospitals was a detailed version of what we have been reading on the news.
                    So why wasn't the report delivered to the White House instead of the IG coordinating with the media to ambush Trump and the China flu taskforce?
                    Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                    But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                    Than a fool in the eyes of God


                    From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                      So why wasn't the report delivered to the White House instead of the IG coordinating with the media to ambush Trump and the China flu taskforce?
                      The only report of that is from conservative tree house, and I do think that the conservative tree house is being deliberately dishonest in that assessment. If there is another source, I would be interested.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by simplicio View Post
                        The only report of that is from conservative tree house, and I do think that the conservative tree house is being deliberately dishonest in that assessment. If there is another source, I would be interested.
                        Ah, the genetic fallacy. Well played.
                        Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                        But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                        Than a fool in the eyes of God


                        From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                          Which is to say that all your talk about them being "independent" is a load of crap.

                          Since when does "oversight" imply that they should go out of their way to keep the president in the dark and leak juicy tidbits to the media?


                          Do you always use begged when you debate?
                          He fired Atkinson for reporting to Congress and not to him, which is what he is supposed to do, so we already know why he is firing them. Disloyalty to the dictator!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                            Ah, the genetic fallacy. Well played.
                            No, not genetic fallacy. I wonder why that "ambush" theory is not picked up by any other journalists.

                            I think the most reasonable view is that it was probably leaked and not withheld from the administration. Note Trump's response to the report: He disputed the findings that hospitals were facing dire shortages, which contradicts his message, so he went on the attack. None of those findings were surprising.

                            The Trump family business is living in an alternate universe.

                            Comment

                            Related Threads

                            Collapse

                            Topics Statistics Last Post
                            Started by VonTastrophe, Today, 08:53 AM
                            0 responses
                            3 views
                            0 likes
                            Last Post VonTastrophe  
                            Started by seer, Yesterday, 01:12 PM
                            15 responses
                            119 views
                            0 likes
                            Last Post seer
                            by seer
                             
                            Started by rogue06, 04-17-2024, 09:33 AM
                            65 responses
                            425 views
                            1 like
                            Last Post tabibito  
                            Started by whag, 04-16-2024, 10:43 PM
                            65 responses
                            391 views
                            0 likes
                            Last Post seanD
                            by seanD
                             
                            Started by rogue06, 04-16-2024, 09:38 AM
                            0 responses
                            27 views
                            1 like
                            Last Post rogue06
                            by rogue06
                             
                            Working...
                            X