Originally posted by Same Hakeem
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Deeper Waters Forum Guidelines
Notice – The ministries featured in this section of TheologyWeb are guests of this site and in some cases not bargaining for the rough and tumble world of debate forums, though sometimes they are. Additionally, this area is frequented and highlighted for guests who also very often are not acclimated to debate fora. As such, the rules of conduct here will be more strict than in the general forum. This will be something within the discretion of the Moderators and the Ministry Representative, but we simply ask that you conduct yourselves in a manner considerate of the fact that these ministries are our invited guests. You can always feel free to start a related thread in general forum without such extra restrictions. Thank you.
Deeper Waters is founded on the belief that the Christian community has long been in the shallow end of Christianity while there are treasures of the deep waiting to be discovered. Too many in the shallow end are not prepared when they go out beyond those waters and are quickly devoured by sharks. We wish to aid Christians to equip them to navigate the deeper waters of the ocean of truth and come up with treasure in the end.
We also wish to give special aid to those often neglected, that is, the disabled community. This is especially so since our founders are both on the autism spectrum and have a special desire to reach those on that spectrum. While they are a special emphasis, we seek to help others with any disability realize that God can use them and that they are as the Psalmist says, fearfully and wonderfully made.
General TheologyWeb forum rules: here.
Deeper Waters is founded on the belief that the Christian community has long been in the shallow end of Christianity while there are treasures of the deep waiting to be discovered. Too many in the shallow end are not prepared when they go out beyond those waters and are quickly devoured by sharks. We wish to aid Christians to equip them to navigate the deeper waters of the ocean of truth and come up with treasure in the end.
We also wish to give special aid to those often neglected, that is, the disabled community. This is especially so since our founders are both on the autism spectrum and have a special desire to reach those on that spectrum. While they are a special emphasis, we seek to help others with any disability realize that God can use them and that they are as the Psalmist says, fearfully and wonderfully made.
General TheologyWeb forum rules: here.
See more
See less
Is The Bible Literally True?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Same Hakeem View PostI agree that killing infants is immoral.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostHacking to death infants and children is either immoral, or it is not. If you think it can be either, then you all need stop clamoring about the existence of an objective moral standard.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ReformedApologist View PostAnd yet your using an objective moral standard to make that statement. So your claim is self-refuting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostIf you read it in context then you should have understood that what I meant is that (according to you) hacking infants to death is either right or wrong in the absolute sense, objectively. Yet you contradict yourself by defending the biblical gods command to hack infants and children to death. The question for you is, which is it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostAs soon as you pass it on to YHWH.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostIf you read it in context then you should have understood that what I meant is that (according to you) hacking infants to death is either right or wrong in the absolute sense, objectively. Yet you contradict yourself by defending the biblical gods command to hack infants and children to death. The question for you is, which is it?“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Another example that shows that the Bible is not literally true is Rev 22:16 “I Jesus have sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright morning star.” However, it is a fact that Jesus came from a virgin birth, then Jesus did not have a physical father and hence Jesus could not be a physical descendant of David.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Same Hakeem View PostAnother example that shows that the Bible is not literally true is Rev 22:16 “I Jesus have sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright morning star.” However, it is a fact that Jesus came from a virgin birth, then Jesus did not have a physical father and hence Jesus could not be a physical descendant of David.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostTwo words CP, New Testement.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Same Hakeem View PostAnother example that shows that the Bible is not literally true is Rev 22:16 “I Jesus have sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright morning star.” However, it is a fact that Jesus came from a virgin birth, then Jesus did not have a physical father and hence Jesus could not be a physical descendant of David.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostThat presumes that Mary didn't descend from David.
Please let me clarify.
Both genealogies in Matt. 1 and Luke 3 trace Jesus' descent from David to Joseph in name as per Matt 1:16 and Luke 3:23. If Jesus did not a biological father, then Joseph was not his physical father and hence he could not be a physical descendant of David.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-15-2024, 10:19 PM
|
14 responses
75 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by rogue06
03-21-2024, 08:02 AM
|
||
Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-13-2024, 10:13 PM
|
6 responses
61 views
0 likes
|
Last Post 03-22-2024, 09:31 AM | ||
Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-12-2024, 09:36 PM
|
1 response
23 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
03-13-2024, 08:31 AM
|
||
Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-11-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
22 views
2 likes
|
Last Post 03-11-2024, 10:19 PM | ||
Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-08-2024, 11:59 AM
|
7 responses
56 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
Today, 01:54 PM
|
Comment