Originally posted by Juvenal
View Post
Was the caption inaccurate?
Quote mining might feel good in that first rush, but it comes at a reputational cost. What was the very next line in the post you're responding to.
Make that three times.
Liar. Literally no one else had a problem reading it until after you said you were confused. An accurately labeled picture isn't fake news, you reprobate. I've been posting here long enough to get used to the general lack of reading comprehension, but this refusal to acknowledge what you've read in order to repeat calumnies speaks to a moral and intellectual bankruptcy so profound you can't afford to pay attention.
Quote mining might feel good in that first rush, but it comes at a reputational cost. What was the very next line in the post you're responding to.
The reasoning was given. Seven sentences, highlighted twice now. Did you read them?
Make that three times.
Liar. Literally no one else had a problem reading it until after you said you were confused. An accurately labeled picture isn't fake news, you reprobate. I've been posting here long enough to get used to the general lack of reading comprehension, but this refusal to acknowledge what you've read in order to repeat calumnies speaks to a moral and intellectual bankruptcy so profound you can't afford to pay attention.
Comment