Universalism - God's answer to Annihilationism and Eternal Punishment - TheologyWeb Campus
TheologyWeb Campus TheologyWeb Campus


Hello and welcome to TheologyWeb – theology debate with a serious dose of fun! It has been our goal to create one of the best and most innovative discussion sites on the Net. Please visit our forums where we debate and discuss everything from religion, politics, lifestyle, pop culture, to who is the coolest member of the moderating team. Register now and join in the fun, its free, easy, and makes Dee Dee Warren happy.




*This site is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox with a minimum display resolution of 1024x768.

Reply

Universalism - God's answer to Annihilationism and Eternal Punishment
View First Unread
infide is offline
infide Nonviolent on Principle
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Agnostic  |  Liberal  
Posts: 1,740
Join Date: March 16th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 2008
Pearls: 549
 
Old
  August 13th 2007 , 09:59 PM
 
 
 
 
 
A simple argument:

(1) If someone is either lost forever or destroyed, then God's Goodness or Patience has failed.
(2) Under annihilationism people are destroyed and under eternal punishment people are lost forever.
(3) If either annihilationism is true or eternal punishment is true then God's Goodness or patience has failed. (1,2)
(4) God's goodness and patience do not fail.
(5) Therefore annihilationism and eternal punishment are false. (3,4,contrapos.)

This argument is inspired by this verse from Paul:
"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Love never fails." (1 Cor 13:4-8)

And from John:
"God is Love" (1 John 4:16)

So, If God is Love, and Love is patient and Love always hopes and Love keeps no record of wrongs - then where, exactly, could either annihilationism or eternal punishment fit in?

Peace,
JD

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"As to the justice of endless punishment, minds enjoying the liberty of free inquiry could easily detect the diabolical character of such justice, as it is the exact opposite of the Divine nature, which is love. Such justice is evidently predicated on the false principle and ungodly practice of rendering evil for evil."-Hosea Ballou
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 

The following tWebber says Amen to infide for this useful Post:
Arminian is offline
Arminian tWebber
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 2,058
Join Date: February 4th, 2003
Spam: 506 | Anti-Spam: 946
Pearls: 362
 
Old
  August 13th 2007 , 11:01 PM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 

 
    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
     
Always reforming. How can you believe if you accept praise from one another, yet make no effort to obtain the praise that comes from the only God? (John 5:44)
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
RanRan is offline
RanRan Still the Janitor
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 4,174
Join Date: November 28th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 526
Pearls: 495
 
Old
  August 14th 2007 , 04:12 PM
 
In reply to this post by infide
Last edited by RanRan : August 14th 2007 at 04:20 PM .  
 
 
So, If God is Love, and Love is patient and Love always hopes and Love keeps no record of wrongs - then where, exactly, could either annihilationism or eternal punishment fit in?

Peace,
JD
Both fit into a somewhat constrained and narrow view of God while avoiding the center. The Gospel isn't so much believed, as tolerated for many on another agenda and presentation of God.

Here's the irony: as they plumb the 'depths' - God's love for humanity becomes all the more constrained or non-existent. "God is Love' has become a great joke for the wise. 'Everyone will be salted with fire.' Some of us know God's love is in that fire. The Orthodox have always known it.

 
  Letterman: gym debate particpant - Issue reason: debate warrior    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"The whole human race will be found to be under a curse...The Father of all wished His Christ, for the whole human family, to take upon Him the curses of all" Justin Martyr c160
'For He is the most holy and merciful Lord, and He loves the human race.'Irenaeus c180
'You have already been ransomed by Christ - and that at a great price!'Tertullian c211
"We trust in the living God, who is the Savior of All men, especially those who believe." St. Paul c60
"'And in Him is no darkness at all' - that is, no passion, no keeping up of evil respecting anyone. He destroys no one, but grants salvation to all." Clement of Alexandria c195
"God hates your guts until you believe that He doesn't." 20th Century 'theology'
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
infide is offline
infide Nonviolent on Principle
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Agnostic  |  Liberal  
Posts: 1,740
Join Date: March 16th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 2008
Pearls: 549
 
Old
  August 14th 2007 , 10:00 PM
 
In reply to this post by RanRan
 
 
 
Both fit into a somewhat constrained and narrow view of God while avoiding the center. The Gospel isn't so much believed, as tolerated for many on another agenda and presentation of God.

Here's the irony: as they plumb the 'depths' - God's love for humanity becomes all the more constrained or non-existent. "God is Love' has become a great joke for the wise. 'Everyone will be salted with fire.' Some of us know God's love is in that fire. The Orthodox have always known it.
"35 But love your enemies, do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return. Your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High; for he is kind to the ungrateful and the wicked. 36 Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful." (Luke 6:35-36, NRSV)

If Jesus' argument is that the reason we ought to love even our enemies is that God is ungrateful and merciful to the wicked, then it is not possible to have a consistent view of God under the eternal punishment or annihilationist views.

peace,
jd

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"As to the justice of endless punishment, minds enjoying the liberty of free inquiry could easily detect the diabolical character of such justice, as it is the exact opposite of the Divine nature, which is love. Such justice is evidently predicated on the false principle and ungodly practice of rendering evil for evil."-Hosea Ballou
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Lost is offline
Lost human
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  unclassified  |  ...  
Posts: 1,756
Join Date: April 15th, 2006
Spam: 7 | Anti-Spam: 857
Pearls: 449
 
Old
  August 14th 2007 , 10:24 PM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 
"35 But love your enemies, do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return. Your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High; for he is kind to the ungrateful and the wicked. 36 Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful." (Luke 6:35-36, NRSV)

If Jesus' argument is that the reason we ought to love even our enemies is that God is ungrateful and merciful to the wicked, then it is not possible to have a consistent view of God under the eternal punishment or annihilationist views.

peace,
jd
I have given up trying to make sense out of the bible - esp the NT - God is the God of the complicated theology student and has written so much gobbildygook that the average person can never make sense out of it.
Happy is the man who never questions anything but just accepts what he is told by his leaders - of course that must then include all religions lol.
What a mess.
Best to leave on'e dam brain behind.

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
RanRan is offline
RanRan Still the Janitor
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 4,174
Join Date: November 28th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 526
Pearls: 495
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 12:35 AM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 
"35 But love your enemies, do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return. Your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High; for he is kind to the ungrateful and the wicked. 36 Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful." (Luke 6:35-36, NRSV)

If Jesus' argument is that the reason we ought to love even our enemies is that God is ungrateful and merciful [sic?] to the wicked, then it is not possible to have a consistent view of God under the eternal punishment or annihilationist views.

peace,
jd
Bingo. The self-righteous have their claims - either the law or faith or a combination of the two - what's the difference when God has placed everyone under disobedience? They will not lump themselves in with their enemies who Christ redeemed as them.

 
  Letterman: gym debate particpant - Issue reason: debate warrior    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"The whole human race will be found to be under a curse...The Father of all wished His Christ, for the whole human family, to take upon Him the curses of all" Justin Martyr c160
'For He is the most holy and merciful Lord, and He loves the human race.'Irenaeus c180
'You have already been ransomed by Christ - and that at a great price!'Tertullian c211
"We trust in the living God, who is the Savior of All men, especially those who believe." St. Paul c60
"'And in Him is no darkness at all' - that is, no passion, no keeping up of evil respecting anyone. He destroys no one, but grants salvation to all." Clement of Alexandria c195
"God hates your guts until you believe that He doesn't." 20th Century 'theology'
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
rhutchin is offline
rhutchin Inquisitive
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 3,630
Join Date: October 2nd, 2003
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 3931
Pearls: 507
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 09:58 AM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 
A simple argument:

(1) If someone is either lost forever or destroyed, then God's Goodness or Patience has failed.
(2) Under annihilationism people are destroyed and under eternal punishment people are lost forever.
(3) If either annihilationism is true or eternal punishment is true then God's Goodness or patience has failed. (1,2)
(4) God's goodness and patience do not fail.
(5) Therefore annihilationism and eternal punishment are false. (3,4,contrapos.)

This argument is inspired by this verse from Paul:
"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Love never fails." (1 Cor 13:4-8)

And from John:
"God is Love" (1 John 4:16)

So, If God is Love, and Love is patient and Love always hopes and Love keeps no record of wrongs - then where, exactly, could either annihilationism or eternal punishment fit in?

Peace,
JD
That seems to be why the Calvinists say that God only intended to save the elect. We must harmonize the verses you note above with all those verses that speak of judgment and distinguish between eternal life and eternal death.

Thus your argument should begin;
(1) If any of the Elect is either lost forever or destroyed, then God's Goodness or Patience has failed.

 
    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Bill the Cat is offline
Bill the Cat A match made in...
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 18,967
Join Date: February 24th, 2003
Spam: 21253 | Anti-Spam: 3913
Pearls: 1096
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 10:22 AM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 
Honor's Hall Pick
A simple argument:
Too simple. There needs to be more in here.

(1) If someone is either lost forever or destroyed, then God's Goodness or Patience has failed.
Along this same vein, since God is good and He created everything, and evil exists, then His goodness failed. His "goodness" is not lacking other attributes. We can't slice God intl little bitty sections and then force a contradiction in there.

(2) Under annihilationism people are destroyed and under eternal punishment people are lost forever.
As justice meets free will. There must be a balance between mercy and justice, for God is both merciful AND just.

(3) If either annihilationism is true or eternal punishment is true then God's Goodness or patience has failed. (1,2)
No, it shows a misunderstanding of what it means when we say "God is good". The fact that the devil and the demons rebelled and will be destroyed in the Lake of Fire would violate this view of God being good. So either this view of God being good and patient is wrong, or even the devil will escape the lake of fire. That violates scripture directly.

(4) God's goodness and patience do not fail.
Nor do His justice, holiness, and righteousness. These attributes COMBINED (for we can not separate God into slices we like) form the picture of God in the Bible. He mercifully saves those who believe in Him and justly punishes those that do not.

(5) Therefore annihilationism and eternal punishment are false. (3,4,contrapos.)
Do you believe the devil will be eventually released from the lake of fire? Why would God's goodness and patience not extend even to the accuser of the bretheren?

This argument is inspired by this verse from Paul:
"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Love never fails." (1 Cor 13:4-8)

And from John:
"God is Love" (1 John 4:16)

So, If God is Love, and Love is patient and Love always hopes and Love keeps no record of wrongs - then where, exactly, could either annihilationism or eternal punishment fit in?
Because love does not delight in evil. It separates evil, and those who choose to remain in evil can not be in His presence. Because He IS good, evil has no place with Him.

 
  Letterman: gym debate particpant - Issue reason: meow Alumnus of the Month: AotM vote winner - Issue reason: August 2005 Alumnus Department Head: is somewhat mighty! - Issue reason: President of the Jolonda fan club    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
     

Rest in peace Curtmudgeon.
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
The Remonstrant is offline
The Remonstrant Ecclesiastes iv. 1-3
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  (unaffiliated)  
Posts: 289
Join Date: October 30th, 2006
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 178
Pearls: 470
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 05:35 PM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 
Originally posted by infide
A simple argument:

(1) If someone is either lost forever or destroyed, then God's Goodness or Patience has failed.
(2) Under annihilationism people are destroyed and under eternal punishment people are lost forever.
(3) If either annihilationism is true or eternal punishment is true then God's Goodness or patience has failed. (1,2)
(4) God's goodness and patience do not fail.
(5) Therefore annihilationism and eternal punishment are false. (3,4,contrapos.)
A question: Should not our conclusions regarding final destinies be based on more than deductive thinking? I would say logical deduction should play a role in our theology, but solid conclusions cannot be arrived at without a cumulative case for our various doctrinal stances.

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
Now updated bi-annually:
http://neo-remonstrance.blogspot.com/
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
infide is offline
infide Nonviolent on Principle
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Agnostic  |  Liberal  
Posts: 1,740
Join Date: March 16th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 2008
Pearls: 549
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 07:11 PM
 
 
 
 
Too simple. There needs to be more in here.
Probably, it was a rough argument intended to foster discussion. it worked?

Along this same vein, since God is good and He created everything, and evil exists, then His goodness failed. His "goodness" is not lacking other attributes. We can't slice God intl little bitty sections and then force a contradiction in there.
Ok, first of all, I am not talking tiny pieces, I am asking whether or not God has the attribute is unfailingly Good or is unfailingly merciful and the attribute unfailingly patient.

I suggest that all views except the Universalist one ultimately imply that God does not have such attributes - and in terms of eternity, such theologies suggest, God really isnt all that merciful or patient after all.

As justice meets free will. There must be a balance between mercy and justice, for God is both merciful AND just.
But neither can a retributive view of justice on God's part, if God in fact is just in that sense (i think not), negate the fact that God is merciful or patient. Because it is one thing to examine a single attribute of God and wonder about it, but it is quite another to set up a war between God's attributes. God being just cannot mean God is not merciful in some sense, otherwise you are suggesting God is not merciful.

No, it shows a misunderstanding of what it means when we say "God is good". The fact that the devil and the demons rebelled and will be destroyed in the Lake of Fire would violate this view of God being good. So either this view of God being good and patient is wrong, or even the devil will escape the lake of fire. That violates scripture directly.
I think it does not. God is free to have mercy on whomever God chooses to show mercy towards - this is the true message behind Romans 9.

Nor do His justice, holiness, and righteousness. These attributes COMBINED (for we can not separate God into slices we like) form the picture of God in the Bible. He mercifully saves those who believe in Him and justly punishes those that do not.
That all well and good, but the idea that combining attributes can negate an attribute (even for a moment) is purely problematic - especially if we want to say something like God is a necessary being. If God ever fails to hold an attribute that is essential to the divine nature, then this being so referred just is not divine.

Do you believe the devil will be eventually released from the lake of fire? Why would God's goodness and patience not extend even to the accuser of the bretheren?
Yes, but not dogmatically so - but that is quite beside the point. I think it is suggested in the verse on the reconciliation of all things in Colossians 1.

Because love does not delight in evil. It separates evil, and those who choose to remain in evil can not be in His presence. Because He IS good, evil has no place with Him.
This seems to suggest that what God is like is that God is threatened by evil, and must therefore seperate evil from God's self. Jesus specifically demonstrated that God is not like this - God enters into fallen humanity and transforms it through His Mercy and Love.

Peace,
jd

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"As to the justice of endless punishment, minds enjoying the liberty of free inquiry could easily detect the diabolical character of such justice, as it is the exact opposite of the Divine nature, which is love. Such justice is evidently predicated on the false principle and ungodly practice of rendering evil for evil."-Hosea Ballou
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
spitndirt is offline
spitndirt a kind and gentle ass
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Neo-Christian  |  orthodoxy who?  
Posts: 1,969
Join Date: November 25th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 2059
Pearls: 492
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 07:44 PM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 
A simple argument:

(1) If someone is either lost forever or destroyed, then God's Goodness or Patience has failed.
(2) Under annihilationism people are destroyed and under eternal punishment people are lost forever.
(3) If either annihilationism is true or eternal punishment is true then God's Goodness or patience has failed. (1,2)
(4) God's goodness and patience do not fail.
(5) Therefore annihilationism and eternal punishment are false. (3,4,contrapos.)

This argument is inspired by this verse from Paul:
"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Love never fails." (1 Cor 13:4-8)

And from John:
"God is Love" (1 John 4:16)

So, If God is Love, and Love is patient and Love always hopes and Love keeps no record of wrongs - then where, exactly, could either annihilationism or eternal punishment fit in?

Peace,
JD
Way to deny that God created men with wills that signify actual 'not God' identities. Show me where all men are raised to put on immortality and I will seriously consider your implied position. I can show where men are raised back to a mortal state (Lazarus for one). I can also show that some will not be given a share in the tree of life, Rev. 22:19. So...if you can show how a man can be eternally sustained in 'life' without immortality and without a share in the tree of life then I will seriously consider what you are implying.

About 'love'. Is it a loving thing that God would continue to subject the innocent to the schemes of the guilty for all eternity? This is a present phenomenon that will never be carried over into the new heaven and earth (the home of righteousness). My view at present....

Peace...

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
RanRan is offline
RanRan Still the Janitor
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 4,174
Join Date: November 28th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 526
Pearls: 495
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 10:32 PM
 
 
 
 
Show me where all men are raised to put on immortality and I will seriously consider your implied position.
'For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive.' 1cor15 Everyone is resurrected.

Is it a loving thing that God would continue to subject the innocent to the schemes of the guilty for all eternity?
'For Christ died for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous' 1pet3
God subjects the guilty to HIS scheme!
There is no one innocent, except Christ.

 
  Letterman: gym debate particpant - Issue reason: debate warrior    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"The whole human race will be found to be under a curse...The Father of all wished His Christ, for the whole human family, to take upon Him the curses of all" Justin Martyr c160
'For He is the most holy and merciful Lord, and He loves the human race.'Irenaeus c180
'You have already been ransomed by Christ - and that at a great price!'Tertullian c211
"We trust in the living God, who is the Savior of All men, especially those who believe." St. Paul c60
"'And in Him is no darkness at all' - that is, no passion, no keeping up of evil respecting anyone. He destroys no one, but grants salvation to all." Clement of Alexandria c195
"God hates your guts until you believe that He doesn't." 20th Century 'theology'
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
infide is offline
infide Nonviolent on Principle
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Agnostic  |  Liberal  
Posts: 1,740
Join Date: March 16th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 2008
Pearls: 549
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 10:45 PM
 
In reply to this post by rhutchin
 
 
 
That seems to be why the Calvinists say that God only intended to save the elect. We must harmonize the verses you note above with all those verses that speak of judgment and distinguish between eternal life and eternal death.
And this is precisely why I am not a Calvinist. The idea that God would arbitrarily save some to satisfy the good-guy part of God and arbitrarily condemn others to satisfy some abstract "justice" seems to me to be neither merciful nor just.

And let me remind you, there is nothing just about an eternal divine punishment! The punishment ought fit the crime, and the idea that a finite crime could be worthy of an infinite punishment is irrational.

peace,
jd

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"As to the justice of endless punishment, minds enjoying the liberty of free inquiry could easily detect the diabolical character of such justice, as it is the exact opposite of the Divine nature, which is love. Such justice is evidently predicated on the false principle and ungodly practice of rendering evil for evil."-Hosea Ballou
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Sparko is online now
Sparko Troll Magnet
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 34,814
Join Date: June 2nd, 2004
Spam: 24624 | Anti-Spam: 9643
Pearls: 1684
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 10:48 PM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 
If God saves everyone even if they reject him and enjoy doing evil, then God is not Just. In fact he would be condoning evil.

He is also ineffective and serves no purpose whatsoever. He could have just set up the system to put people in "heaven" when they die and just left the universe alone . Same result.

A universalist God is a nongod.

 
  Letterman: gym debate particpant - Issue reason:  Geek: computer lab contest winner - Issue reason: has a yapper dog Alumnus of the Month: AotM vote winner - Issue reason: September 2004 Alumnus Department Head: is somewhat mighty! - Issue reason: heaven-bound fat Christian    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
infide is offline
infide Nonviolent on Principle
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Agnostic  |  Liberal  
Posts: 1,740
Join Date: March 16th, 2005
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 2008
Pearls: 549
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 10:51 PM
 
 
 
 
Way to deny that God created men with wills that signify actual 'not God' identities. Show me where all men are raised to put on immortality and I will seriously consider your implied position.
Actually, my view on this is rather nuanced, and still in the works. All are raised, but not all are reconciled at that time. Rather, I believe there is a progression to the reconciliation of the entire created order. Some have to go through the fire of divine grace first. Some are already reconciled. But Colossians 1:20 assures us that the reconciliation will not be short of all things created.

I can show where men are raised back to a mortal state (Lazarus for one). I can also show that some will not be given a share in the tree of life, Rev. 22:19. So...if you can show how a man can be eternally sustained in 'life' without immortality and without a share in the tree of life then I will seriously consider what you are implying.
All are resurrected. All are reconciled. But not at the same time.

About 'love'. Is it a loving thing that God would continue to subject the innocent to the schemes of the guilty for all eternity? This is a present phenomenon that will never be carried over into the new heaven and earth (the home of righteousness). My view at present....

Peace...
No its not loving for God to do that, which is why there is any sort of divine judgement at all. Because some take longer than others to come to terms with the reality of God and His ways. But all get it... eventually.

peace,
jd

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"As to the justice of endless punishment, minds enjoying the liberty of free inquiry could easily detect the diabolical character of such justice, as it is the exact opposite of the Divine nature, which is love. Such justice is evidently predicated on the false principle and ungodly practice of rendering evil for evil."-Hosea Ballou
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Sparko is online now
Sparko Troll Magnet
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 34,814
Join Date: June 2nd, 2004
Spam: 24624 | Anti-Spam: 9643
Pearls: 1684
 
Old
  August 15th 2007 , 11:04 PM
 
In reply to this post by infide
 
 
 
No its not loving for God to do that, which is why there is any sort of divine judgement at all. Because some take longer than others to come to terms with the reality of God and His ways. But all get it... eventually.

peace,
jd
When? After they die? Because some people go to their graves cursing God.

The bible says that there is no chance after death, btw.


also why does the bible spend so much effort talking about judgment if there will not be any? If everyone is saved then Judgment is useless and warning us about it in the bible is a waste of pages.

 
  Letterman: gym debate particpant - Issue reason:  Geek: computer lab contest winner - Issue reason: has a yapper dog Alumnus of the Month: AotM vote winner - Issue reason: September 2004 Alumnus Department Head: is somewhat mighty! - Issue reason: heaven-bound fat Christian    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 

« Previous Thread   |   Post New Thread   |   Next Thread »


 
Forum Jump  

Page generated in 1.73908 seconds with 14 queries