Mormon missionaries - TheologyWeb Campus
TheologyWeb Campus TheologyWeb Campus


Hello and welcome to TheologyWeb – theology debate with a serious dose of fun! It has been our goal to create one of the best and most innovative discussion sites on the Net. Please visit our forums where we debate and discuss everything from religion, politics, lifestyle, pop culture, to who is the coolest member of the moderating team. Register now and join in the fun, its free, easy, and makes Dee Dee Warren happy.




*This site is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox with a minimum display resolution of 1024x768.

Reply

Mormon missionaries
View First Unread
Kabane52 is offline
Kabane52 youtube.com/kabanethechristian
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Orthodox  |  Conservatarian  
Posts: 876
Join Date: August 31st, 2007
Spam: 3 | Anti-Spam: 105
Pearls: 270
 
Old
  June 21st 2009 , 01:52 AM
 
 
 
 
 
Well, I was on the Mormon church's website a lot this week, and I talked to several Mormon missionaries online. I told them I had two questions for them, and they seemed eager to answer before I mentioned what the questions were. They were
1. On Joseph Smith's joining of a Methodist church
2. The Book of Abraham demonstrable fraud

These were the responses I got.
Two of them immediately transferred me to another missionary after hearing the questions
One of them stated that the Spirit gave him a witness that the Book of Abraham is scripture
One of them stated that I had ulterior motives for asking these questions.
One of them asked me to pray to the Spirit about the truth of Mormonism. When I told him that if I felt anything, I felt the Spirit telling me that it was false, he accused me of having ulterior motives
One of them was very polite and courteous, but could only appeal to his testimony.

None of them had ever actually heard of these before. The courteous one in particular seemed a bit disturbed at first by these facts. Perhaps some seeds of doubt were planted.

So, yeah, basically I'm walking away with the feeling that these people cannot answer these arguments.

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
See Silly YouTube Skeptics Slapped Around here
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
onefour1 is offline
onefour1 tWebber
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Mormon  |  non party voter  
Posts: 68
Join Date: January 5th, 2009
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 112
Pearls: 200
 
Old
  June 21st 2009 , 05:28 AM
 
In reply to this post by Kabane52
Last edited by rogue06 : June 24th 2009 at 12:22 PM .  
 
 
Well, I was on the Mormon church's website a lot this week, and I talked to several Mormon missionaries online. I told them I had two questions for them, and they seemed eager to answer before I mentioned what the questions were. They were
1. On Joseph Smith's joining of a Methodist church
2. The Book of Abraham demonstrable fraud

These were the responses I got.
Two of them immediately transferred me to another missionary after hearing the questions
One of them stated that the Spirit gave him a witness that the Book of Abraham is scripture
One of them stated that I had ulterior motives for asking these questions.
One of them asked me to pray to the Spirit about the truth of Mormonism. When I told him that if I felt anything, I felt the Spirit telling me that it was false, he accused me of having ulterior motives
One of them was very polite and courteous, but could only appeal to his testimony.

None of them had ever actually heard of these before. The courteous one in particular seemed a bit disturbed at first by these facts. Perhaps some seeds of doubt were planted.

So, yeah, basically I'm walking away with the feeling that these people cannot answer these arguments.
You are absolutely right that most members and missionaries can't answer some of the questions that anti-mormons never thought to ask until they spent years to research and formulate the questions. Most non-members don't even think to even ask such questions without consulting their handy anti-mormon sites on the internet. Questions that take a long time to research and pin LDS down on take others time to research to find answers for them. But we LDS do have people who read these well thought out questions and do the research to give well thought out answers. Here are two links to get you started on some of the thoughtful LDS answers to the thoughtful questions you bring up:

Edited by a Moderator

Moderated By: rogue06

Let's not argue via weblink. Supply a summary of each and then a link

***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publically complain or whine, please take it to the Psychotherapy Room unless told otherwise.



 
    tWebber  
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
nrajeff is offline
nrajeff dumb, according to some
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  LDS  |  Conservative  
Posts: 1,400
Join Date: September 30th, 2008
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 831
Pearls: 250
 
Old
  June 22nd 2009 , 10:13 AM
 
In reply to this post by Kabane52
 
 
 
Good response, 141.

 
    tWebber  
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Sparko is offline
Sparko Troll Magnet
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 29,916
Join Date: June 2nd, 2004
Spam: 24132 | Anti-Spam: 8178
Pearls: 1316
 
Old
  June 24th 2009 , 11:35 AM
 
In reply to this post by Kabane52
 
 
 
good response? arguing by weblinks?

 
  Letterman: gym debate particpant - Issue reason:  Geek: computer lab contest winner - Issue reason: has a yapper dog Alumnus of the Month: AotM vote winner - Issue reason: September 2004 Alumnus Department Head: is somewhat mighty! - Issue reason: heaven-bound fat Christian    Quiner Member tWebber  
     

Proud Member of Da Blonde's Axis of Evil, Adam's Dirty Dozen, Dee Dee's Goon Squad, Tweb's In-Crowd, The Brood of Vipers & Exorcised by Ty & Dee Dee
"I am like a bad case of athletes foot, and you are like a man without Tenactin," Faramir.

 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
nrajeff is offline
nrajeff dumb, according to some
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  LDS  |  Conservative  
Posts: 1,400
Join Date: September 30th, 2008
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 831
Pearls: 250
 
Old
  June 24th 2009 , 01:51 PM
 
In reply to this post by Sparko
 
 
 
good response? arguing by weblinks?
---No, good response, acknowledging that Kabane52 was

"absolutely right that most members and missionaries can't answer some of the questions that anti-mormons never thought to ask until they spent years to research and formulate the questions. Most non-members don't even think to even ask such questions without consulting their handy anti-mormon sites on the internet."

and good response, pointing out that

"Questions that take a long time to research and pin LDS down on take others time to research to find answers for them. But we LDS do have people who read these well thought out questions and do the research to give well thought out answers."

and then helpfully suggesting, in the way of answers:


"Here are two links to get you started on some of the thoughtful LDS answers to the thoughtful questions you bring up"

 
    tWebber  
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Sparko is offline
Sparko Troll Magnet
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Christian  |  Conservative  
Posts: 29,916
Join Date: June 2nd, 2004
Spam: 24132 | Anti-Spam: 8178
Pearls: 1316
 
Old
  June 24th 2009 , 03:25 PM
 
In reply to this post by nrajeff
 
 
 
---No, good response, acknowledging that Kabane52 was

"absolutely right that most members and missionaries can't answer some of the questions that anti-mormons never thought to ask until they spent years to research and formulate the questions. Most non-members don't even think to even ask such questions without consulting their handy anti-mormon sites on the internet."

and good response, pointing out that

"Questions that take a long time to research and pin LDS down on take others time to research to find answers for them. But we LDS do have people who read these well thought out questions and do the research to give well thought out answers."

and then helpfully suggesting, in the way of answers:


"Here are two links to get you started on some of the thoughtful LDS answers to the thoughtful questions you bring up"
they seemed to be two fairly easy questions, Jeff. Nothing that takes a scholar to answer. He seemed to be admitting that most mormons are severely lacking in knowledge of their own founder's history and the historic background on a very important book of scripture in the LDS church. I guess you guys are kept pretty sheltered by your cult, huh?

 
  Letterman: gym debate particpant - Issue reason:  Geek: computer lab contest winner - Issue reason: has a yapper dog Alumnus of the Month: AotM vote winner - Issue reason: September 2004 Alumnus Department Head: is somewhat mighty! - Issue reason: heaven-bound fat Christian    Quiner Member tWebber  
     

Proud Member of Da Blonde's Axis of Evil, Adam's Dirty Dozen, Dee Dee's Goon Squad, Tweb's In-Crowd, The Brood of Vipers & Exorcised by Ty & Dee Dee
"I am like a bad case of athletes foot, and you are like a man without Tenactin," Faramir.

 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
nrajeff is offline
nrajeff dumb, according to some
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  LDS  |  Conservative  
Posts: 1,400
Join Date: September 30th, 2008
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 831
Pearls: 250
 
Old
  June 24th 2009 , 05:54 PM
 
In reply to this post by Sparko
 
 
 
they seemed to be two fairly easy questions, Jeff.
----Then why does it seem that some of you a problem with the answers?

Nothing that takes a scholar to answer.
---Yet sometimes some people want "scholarly backup for you beliefs, 'cause why should I take your word for it? You're not an authority, it's just your opinion, let's see something official." But when something official is provided to back up the opinion, STILL some people complain. As my dad used to say, "You'd complain if they hanged you with a new rope."

He seemed to be admitting that most mormons are severely lacking in knowledge of their own founder's history and the historic background on a very important book of scripture in the LDS church.
---I didn't see "severely" in there. I saw "members and missionaries can't answer some of the questions that anti-mormons never thought to ask until they spent years to research and formulate the questions."

I guess you guys are kept pretty sheltered by your cult, huh?
---Do you seriously think I, and the others here, are sheltered little waifs, naive, uneducated, and oblivious to scholarship? Question: How familiar with the works of John Wesley, Martin Luther, or Tom Aquinas, is the average Reformationist?

 
    tWebber  
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
onefour1 is offline
onefour1 tWebber
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Mormon  |  non party voter  
Posts: 68
Join Date: January 5th, 2009
Spam: 0 | Anti-Spam: 112
Pearls: 200
 
Old
  June 25th 2009 , 02:10 AM
 
In reply to this post by Kabane52
 
 
 
Well, I was on the Mormon church's website a lot this week, and I talked to several Mormon missionaries online. I told them I had two questions for them, and they seemed eager to answer before I mentioned what the questions were. They were
1. On Joseph Smith's joining of a Methodist church
2. The Book of Abraham demonstrable fraud

These were the responses I got.
Two of them immediately transferred me to another missionary after hearing the questions
One of them stated that the Spirit gave him a witness that the Book of Abraham is scripture
One of them stated that I had ulterior motives for asking these questions.
One of them asked me to pray to the Spirit about the truth of Mormonism. When I told him that if I felt anything, I felt the Spirit telling me that it was false, he accused me of having ulterior motives
One of them was very polite and courteous, but could only appeal to his testimony.

None of them had ever actually heard of these before. The courteous one in particular seemed a bit disturbed at first by these facts. Perhaps some seeds of doubt were planted.

So, yeah, basically I'm walking away with the feeling that these people cannot answer these arguments.
Let's not argue via weblink. Supply a summary of each and then a link

Originally posted by Rogue
Let's not argue via weblink. Supply a summary of each and then a link
In response to the two questions you have in your post, I will post the following Summary responses and supporting links.

1. Joseph Smith never joined the Methodist Church nor any church except the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Before he received the first vision he attended many of the church meetings in the area and was leaning toward the Methodist church. He joined their probationary class (evidently a testing ground for the Methodists to see if those on probation would pass the test of becoming real members) but later renounced the Methodist church and all other religions based on the revelation he received from the Father and Son. In that revelation he was told to join none of them. This information is corroborated by a non-member by the name of Pomeroy Tucker who was an aprentice at the Palmyra Register newspaper around 1820. Pomeroy claimed to have knowledge of the Smith family and lived in Palmyra during the same time Joseph Smith was making his claims. To view the account of Pomeroy Tucker and and the link where this information is found, see Historical or Hysterical— Anti-Mormons and Documentary Sources

2. The Book of Abraham originates from some mummies and Papyrus scrolls that were discovered in Egypt near the city of Thebes. The discoverer willed the ownership of these mummies to his nephew, Michael Chandler, before his death. Mr Chandler had the mummies and scrolls brought to the US and sought out a person to interpret the scrolls. He heard of Joseph Smith and later sold the mummies and ancient documents to members of the church. After Josephs death Jay Todd in the Encyclopedia of Mormonism Vol 3 tells what happened to the mummies and ancient documents in the following :

"After Joseph Smith's death, the Egyptian artifacts were held principally by his mother, and then by Emma Smith after Lucy's death on May 14, 1856. On May 25, 1856, Emma sold "four Egyptian mummies with the records with them" to Mr. Abel Combs (Improvement Era, Jan. 1968, pp. 12-16). (Pioneers brought one fragment west.) Combs then sold two mummies with some papyri, which were sent to the St. Louis Museum (1856); they ended up in the Chicago Museum (1863), where they apparently burned in 1871. The fate of Combs's two other mummies and papyri is unknown, but some papyri remained, for in 1918 Mrs. Alice Heusser of Brooklyn, a daughter of Combs's housekeeper, approached the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art (MMA) with papyri once owned by Joseph Smith. In 1947 MMA acquired papyri from her widower. In May 1966 Aziz S. Atiya of the University of Utah saw eleven Heusser fragments at MMA. He informed Church leaders, and on November 27, 1967, the Church acquired the fragments; one of them is Facsimile No. 1."

Critics of the church claim that those documents that surfaced in the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art are the entire source of the Book of Abraham. But as noted above, there were other sources that have been lost. Also the descriptions of the documents that Joseph Smith used to translate the Book of Abraham do not match the description of what was found in the NY Metropolitan Museum of Art. Modern scholars have interpeted the writings on those documents found in the MMA and have concluded that they are not what is written in the Book of Abraham. Thus the claim of fraud by critics. But because not all the documents were necessarily of Abraham and because the description of the the documents do not match and the fact that there are still lost portions of the documents, there is no way to prove that the MMA documents were what Joseph Smith used as the source of the Book of Abraham. The source of this information can be found at the this link Questions About the Book of Abraham:
Clumsy Fraud or Sacred Scripture?

 
    tWebber  
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
« Previous Thread   |   Post New Thread   |   Next Thread »


 
Forum Jump  

Page generated in 0.73651 seconds with 14 queries