And here is another impliament from Antediluvia : The World that then was.

The Mysterious Egyptian Tri-Lobed Disc

Making excavations in 1936, in the archaeological zone of Sakkara, he discovered the Tomb of Prince Sabu. He was the son of Adjuib Pharaoh, governor of the I Dynasty (3,000 B.C.). Between utensils of funeral objects that were extracted, Emery’s attention was powerfully drawn by an object that he initially defined in his report on the Great Tombs of the I Dynasty as: "... a container in the form of schist bowl". Years later, in his previously mentioned work, Archaic Egypt, he commented on the object with a word that perfectly summarizes the reality of the situation and the discomfort the object causes; "cachibache" (a small hole that threatens to become a much larger hole)." It is made of schist, a very fragile and delicate rock, which requires very laborious carving. A satisfactory explanation has not yet been obtained on the peculiar design of this object".

http://s8int.com/phile/page52.html

Originally posted by Theoferrum

You would know...

You keep on referring to our uncles who were monkeys.

No evolutionist claims that humans share a common ancestor with monkeys or, to put it in your words, that their uncles are monkeys.

I wonder if you can explain why?



Regards, Roland

Originally posted by Theoferrum

And here is another impliament from Antediluvia : The World that then was.

The Mysterious Egyptian Tri-Lobed Disc

Making excavations in 1936, in the archaeological zone of Sakkara, he discovered the Tomb of Prince Sabu. He was the son of Adjuib Pharaoh, governor of the I Dynasty (3,000 B.C.). Between utensils of funeral objects that were extracted, Emery’s attention was powerfully drawn by an object that he initially defined in his report on the Great Tombs of the I Dynasty as: "... a container in the form of schist bowl". Years later, in his previously mentioned work, Archaic Egypt, he commented on the object with a word that perfectly summarizes the reality of the situation and the discomfort the object causes; "cachibache" (a small hole that threatens to become a much larger hole)." It is made of schist, a very fragile and delicate rock, which requires very laborious carving. A satisfactory explanation has not yet been obtained on the peculiar design of this object".

http://s8int.com/phile/page52.html

Man. That little artefact polished up well. It looks like it popped out of some manufacturing mold, only yesterday.


Regards, Roland

Originally posted by wattsr1

You keep on referring to our uncles who were monkeys.

No evolutionist claims that humans share a common ancestor with monkeys or, to put it in your words, that their uncles are monkeys.

I wonder if you can explain why?



Regards, Roland

I dont know -but whatever you do, don't tell Darwin that...

Here are some more dinosaur figurines from people that weren't supposed to know what a dino was.

• Edited by a Moderator •

Moderated By: T-Shirt Ninja

No posting cited material longer than 8 sentences. ***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.*** Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publically complain or whine, please take it to the Psychotherapy Room unless told otherwise.

Originally posted by wattsr1

Man. That little artefact polished up well. It looks like it popped out of some manufacturing mold, only yesterday.


Regards, Roland

Whatever it was, it was machine manufactored.

Antediluvia - ya gotta love it...

Originally posted by Theoferrum

I dont know -but whatever you do, don't tell Darwin that...

No, you don't know.

It would appear that you don't even know what Darwin understood about the matter either.

It would appear that, out of the three of us, Darwin, yourself and myself, you are the only one who is ignorant on what we actually claim.

As with CTD__ are you always this silly?



Regards, Roland

Originally posted by Theoferrum

Really?

How did that fake bet embedded in granite, Einstein?

Someone drilled a hole and stuck it in. The sharp edge of the hole compared to the rounded and worn outside of the rock is a dead giveaway. I don't believe the claim of "no glue" for a second.

Originally posted by Theoferrum

Whatever it was, it was machine manufactored.

Antediluvia - ya gotta love it...

Still looks like it was made just yesterday, doesn't it. Hence it's good evidence that the earth is only one day old, and that God must have poofed the factory into existence, ex nihilo.


Regards, Roland

Originally posted by wattsr1

No, you don't know.

It would appear that you don't even know what Darwin understood about the matter either.

It would appear that, out of the three of us, Darwin, yourself and myself, you are the only one who is ignorant on what we actually claim.

As with CTD__ are you always this silly?



Regards, Roland

"The same judgment you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself" - which would explain why you think your uncle is a monkey. At least, that's what the poster below proclaims, isn't it?

But, answer me this, Einstein.

Where are the MILLIONS of Missing Links that should be contained in the fossil record of all the in-between species of every species currently on the planet?

Originally posted by JonF

Someone drilled a hole and stuck it in. The sharp edge of the hole compared to the rounded and worn outside of the rock is a dead giveaway. I don't believe the claim of "no glue" for a second.

You don't know much about drilling granite, do you?

More Tracks - Mastondons and a Giant. Note that, back then, they didn't claim it was a fraud - what do you do with that. A Genuine artifact and recognized as such before they realized it was a slight problem for the dating methods.

Mysterious Tracks in Stone

The Footprints of a Mastodon and a Human Being Believed Imprinted in the Same Rock

Published: August 13, 1882 Copyright © The New York Times The San Francisco Call

Hundreds of footprints of man and animals were discovered in the quarry of the State prison in Carson, Nevada. Scientists came to Carson to make plaster of Paris copies of the tracks of a mastodon and that of an apparently giant individual. After much examination, and after ruling out animals such as the giant sloth and the bear, it was the opinion of Professor Le Conte of the State University of California that the giant tracks were those of a man.

http://s8int.com/phile/page56.html

I think that's a Reebok©, ain't it...

Large Shoe Print in Rock

This photo was taken in northern Washington state and was reportedly found with another partial imprint. It appears to be the shoeprint of a large individual (see man's shoe in lower right of photo for comparison) approximately 16 inches long from heel to toe.

The rock itself is judged by geologists in "evolutionary time" (as opposed to actual time) to be between 10 and 20 million years old. The point is, according to evolutionary theory, no one should have been around early enough to leave a shoe imprint in what is now solid rock.

http://s8int.com/phile/page56.html

Originally posted by wattsr1

Still looks like it was made just yesterday, doesn't it. Hence it's good evidence that the earth is only one day old, and that God must have poofed the factory into existence, ex nihilo.


Regards, Roland

Nope - simply means that Antediluvia had manufactories, just like we had today which perished in the global flood.

David Dunn, who is a machinist, states, emphatically, that these must have been turned on a lathe. There are thousands of them and the Egyptologists are at a loss to explain how they were made but these were found in Saqqara which I have placed preflood and it is very easy to explain as Antediluvian.

Lathe Turned Stone Housewares

At least one piece is so flawlessly turned that the entire bowl (about 9" in diameter, fully hollowed out including an undercut of the 3in opening in the top) balances perfectly (the top rests horizontally when the bowl is placed on a glass shelf) on a round tipped bottom no bigger than the size and shape of the tip of a hen's egg ! This requires that the entire bowl have a symmetrical wall thickness without any substantial error! (With a base area so tiny - less than .15 " sq - any asymmetry in a material as dense as granite would produce a lean in the balance of the finished piece.) This kind of skill will raise the eyebrows of any machinist. To produce such a piece in clay would be very impressive. In granite it is incredible.

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/joseph.htm

Originally posted by Theoferrum

Nope - simply means that Antediluvia had manufactories, just like we had today which perished in the global flood.

Yep. It simply means that the earth is one day old, and that God poofed the factory into existence yesterday morning so that the object could be made yesterday afternoon.

(Take a look at your own picture. It looks like something made yesterday afternoon, not something thousands of years old, unless of course, you reckon the Flood happened yesterday evening. Do you?)


Regards, Roland