Committee to save merry christmas - TheologyWeb Campus
TheologyWeb Campus TheologyWeb Campus


Hello and welcome to TheologyWeb – theology debate with a serious dose of fun! It has been our goal to create one of the best and most innovative discussion sites on the Net. Please visit our forums where we debate and discuss everything from religion, politics, lifestyle, pop culture, to who is the coolest member of the moderating team. Register now and join in the fun, its free, easy, and makes Dee Dee Warren happy.




*This site is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox with a minimum display resolution of 1024x768.

Reply

Committee to save merry christmas
View First Unread
EvoUK is offline
EvoUK Aw, ain't he cute?
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Atheist  |  Centre-Left  
Posts: 4,072
Join Date: August 17th, 2003
Spam: 789 | Anti-Spam: 1072
Pearls: 650
 
Old
  December 3rd 2004 , 02:55 PM
 
 
 
 
 
The War
A covert and deceptive war has been waged on Christmas to remove any mention of it from the public square during the Christmas season. During the past several years, and with great effectiveness, we have observed a consistent and relentless move to culturally pressure merchants, businessmen and individuals to remove the words “Merry Christmas” from their advertising, decorations and promotional materials.

The festive atmosphere of the past that surrounded the Christmas season in department stores which energized shoppers, supported their culture and tradition, and excited them to select just the right gift for friends and family for the Christmas celebration has been severely diminished. For many, the atmosphere has become offensive and devoid of any meaning.

Our Goal
The primary goal of the Committee to Save Merry Christmas is to preserve the culture and tradition of the vast majority of Americans that celebrate and honor Christmas. Christmas is a nationally declared federal holiday that has been observed from the inception of our nation.

In the past several years, the term “Merry Christmas” has been deliberately and intentionally excluded from major retailers like Federated Department Stores. The words “Merry Christmas” have been deliberately and intentionally removed from their decorations and advertising. Taking their place are non-celebratory phases like “Seasons Greetings” and “Happy Holidays.” When did it become offensive to display or say, “Merry Christmas”?

This intentional and deliberate exclusion of “Merry Christmas” in the Federated Department Stores advertising and decorations is extremely offensive to the culture and tradition of Americans who honor and celebrate Christmas.

Each Christmas season, every kind of decoration, advertising gimmick and sales promotion is hoisted upon the general public by Federated Department Stores directing the public to purchase their merchandise for the Christmas celebration...all the while never mentioning the word, "Christmas." This deliberate and intentional exclusion of “Merry Christmas” by Federated Department Stores with substitute un-celebratory phases is thoughtless, condescending and hurtful.
http://savemerrychristmas.org/index.html

They are upset because Federated uses the more universal "Happy Holidays" instead of the more specific "Happy Christmas". Because when you celebrate the birth of your saviour by buying tonnes of consumer items you want to know why you're doing it.

Instead of realising that xmas is little more than a reason to spend large quantities of money of stuff you don't need and any sort of religious nature of the holiday is gone, they get annoyed because they don't realise that "Happy Holidays" is a phrase devised not to minimize the importance of xmas, but to attract more customers to the xmas buying frenzy.

Also note that they're wrong- xmas has NOT been nationally observed from the inception of your nation, it wasn't a national holiday until after the Civil War.

Besides, Happy Holidays fits a greetings card better than Happy Thanksgivingchristmashannakahkwanzanewyearsday. the s at the end of holiday implies plural, as in multiple holidays.

 
    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
     
If triangles had a God, He'd have three sides.

In 1945 the USA unleashed an enormous amount of energy over Hiroshima and Nagasaki...
What did THAT big bang create..?
Did it create anything at all..?
No it didnt. - Some YEC Muppet
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Pilgrim is offline
Pilgrim The (much missed) Curtmudgeon
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Micah 6:8  |  Micah 6:8  
Posts: 14,254
Join Date: January 27th, 2003
Spam: 1809 | Anti-Spam: 1984
Pearls: 1269
 
Old
  December 3rd 2004 , 03:50 PM
 
In reply to this post by EvoUK
 
 
 
Evo, on many points you are correct but I find your comment about Christmas having no religious conotations anymore to be, well, frankly, stupid.

For millions of folks, if not billions around the world, Christmas is indeed more than a shopping spree. Which is why our churches are filled to overflowing on Christmas eve midnight services with people praying in earnest as they realize the fruit of advent and are moved to faith by the reality of God incarnate.

I assure you that the religious nature of the holiday is far from gone except in the hearts of those who don't care about the holiday in the first place. Just because you don't believe in God don't assume that the rest of us have given up on God as well. I rewalize you are cynic and a skeptic and hold little hope for the purity of religious practice but that's your own baggage, don't unfoist it on the rest of us as if it was "gospel" truth across the board.

 
  Department Head: is somewhat mighty! - Issue reason: proud papa    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
     
If there's no God, what are all those churches for? And who is Jesus' dad? ~ Michael Scott
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Eyeheart Pumpkin is offline
Eyeheart Pumpkin fka Eireann
Currently Unavailable
 
 
Posts: 3,108
Join Date: February 3rd, 2003
Spam: 345 | Anti-Spam: 862
Pearls: 612
 
Old
  December 3rd 2004 , 04:51 PM
 
In reply to this post by Pilgrim
 
 
 
Now this case is just silly. They have completely mischaracterized common intentions behind the use of phrases like "Seasons Greetings" (which has been around for ages) and "Happy Holidays" (which is also not a new thing). What I see here is that victim complex that seems so pervasive among many in the right wing. They say it is a deliberate and calculated removal of "Christmas" from public mention calculated to foment a fundamental disrespect of Christianity and its role in American culture, but it is nothing of the sort. Rather than representing a disrespect of one specific religion, it rather represents a widening respect of multiple views on the various holidays of the winter season. I don't think there is anyone who does not envision Christmas as being part of the package when they hear "Happy Holidays." This really is nothing more than a few disgruntled folks who are peeved at Christianity losing its exclusive hold on the winter season, an exclusivity it never deserved to hold in the first place. Christmas (the Christian version, not the secular version, I mean) is one of many winter holidays celebrated by Americans from all walks of life, it is neither the oldest nor the youngest of those, and none of them deserves to be lauded to the exclusion of all the others. That is what phrases like "Seasons Greetings" and "Happy Holidays" are intended to convey, not to make followers of one religion feel unwelcome, but rather to make followers of several religions, worldviews and traditions feel welcome.

 
    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
     
The Best of the Best: Rush, Queen, Helloween, Gamma Ray, Savatage, TSO, Nightwish, Stratovarius, Freedom Call, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Dimmu Borgir, Blind Guardian, Edguy, Avantasia, Symphony X, Dream Theater ... to be continued ...
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
BeHereNow is offline
BeHereNow edible rapper
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Atheist  |  Libertarian  
Posts: 5,168
Join Date: June 28th, 2003
Spam: 1489 | Anti-Spam: 1122
Pearls: 345
 
Old
  December 3rd 2004 , 07:36 PM
 
 
 
 
Consumerism has been defined as the new religion of Christmas by Dell deChant, chair of religious studies at the Univ. of South Florida, in his book The Sacred Santa. He makes a compelling case comparing religious archetypes to commercial merchants. For example, the shaman or ritual leader would be the salesperson, iirc, and similar meta narratives guide both typical religions and frantic shopping culture.

 
    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
     
The rain, it started tapping on the window near my bed.
There was a loophole in my dreaming, so I got out of it.
And to my surprise my eyes were wide and already open.
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
EvoUK is offline
EvoUK Aw, ain't he cute?
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Atheist  |  Centre-Left  
Posts: 4,072
Join Date: August 17th, 2003
Spam: 789 | Anti-Spam: 1072
Pearls: 650
 
Old
  December 3rd 2004 , 10:26 PM
 
 
 
 
It's funny because the early Puritains had laws against the observation of Christmas because of the self-evident fact that it was a pagan holiday. Come one folks, mistletoe, evergreens, wreaths, a holiday so close to the winter solstice, etc, etc. (I don't really have to go into it do I?).

[honest- though tongue in cheek- moment]Sorry, Christians, that's what you get for stealing all the pagan party days for your depressing religion.[/honest- though tongue in cheek- moment

 
    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
     
If triangles had a God, He'd have three sides.

In 1945 the USA unleashed an enormous amount of energy over Hiroshima and Nagasaki...
What did THAT big bang create..?
Did it create anything at all..?
No it didnt. - Some YEC Muppet
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Pilgrim is offline
Pilgrim The (much missed) Curtmudgeon
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Micah 6:8  |  Micah 6:8  
Posts: 14,254
Join Date: January 27th, 2003
Spam: 1809 | Anti-Spam: 1984
Pearls: 1269
 
Old
  December 4th 2004 , 12:08 PM
 
In reply to this post by EvoUK
 
 
 
The reason had more to do with the Mass than the Christ. They were wary of any thing that smacked of papism.

 
  Department Head: is somewhat mighty! - Issue reason: proud papa    Charter Member Quiner Member tWebber  
     
If there's no God, what are all those churches for? And who is Jesus' dad? ~ Michael Scott
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
Nicholas is offline
Nicholas The Nemesis to your Hubris
Currently Unavailable
 
Male  |  Apatheist  |  Progressive  
Posts: 4,517
Join Date: July 22nd, 2004
Spam: 1076 | Anti-Spam: 800
Pearls: 628
 
Old
  December 4th 2004 , 09:46 PM
 
In reply to this post by Pilgrim
 
 
 
Originally posted by EvoUK
It's funny because the early Puritains had laws against the observation of Christmas because of the self-evident fact that it was a pagan holiday. Come one folks, mistletoe, evergreens, wreaths, a holiday so close to the winter solstice, etc, etc. (I don't really have to go into it do I?).
That's true, the entire reason they put Christmas in the Winter Solstice was because while it was the new Official Roman Religion, that time was already a holiday for many pagans, and in order to take away their thunder, they said Jesus was born at the time, when the fact that the Bible spoke of shepereds checking their flocks at night would seem to mean it was in the spring.

 
    Quiner Member tWebber  
     
"The lesser the people know about how sausages and laws are made, the better they sleep in the night".
- Otto Von Bismarck

“God has a special providence for fools, drunks, and the United States of America.”
-Otto Von Bismarck
 
 
  Reply With Quote
Click Here for Post Options
 
« Previous Thread   |   Post New Thread   |   Next Thread »


 
Forum Jump  

Page generated in 0.33950 seconds with 14 queries