Has anybody taken the Myers-Briggs or the Keirsey Temperment Sorter?
What was your score? Mine is INFP

Some of us did it already here. I'm an ISTJ.

I'm usually on the border between Guardian (ISTJ) and Idealist (INTJ)

Infp :)

Here's a link to prayers for myers-briggs types :)

http://soli.inav.net/~catalyst/Humor/mbprayer.htm

I just did the test real quick, and I'm an INFP, 'Questor' :)

I just went to the prayer for me, and that prayer is so me! ROTFL

"God, help me to finish everything I sta..." LOLOLOL

ESTP or ESFP on a quick online test...

I took this several years ago as part of a big psychological work up as part of the acceptance process for missionary service....think I;ll pull out the old file and see what it said.

INFJ

ENFP

NF * NF love affairs are too hot.

INTP/ENTP

I'm an Extroverted Introvert.

Originally posted by learning

Here's a link to prayers for myers-briggs types :)

http://soli.inav.net/~catalyst/Humor/mbprayer.htm

I just did the test real quick, and I'm an INFP, 'Questor' :)

I just went to the prayer for me, and that prayer is so me! ROTFL

"God, help me to finish everything I sta..." LOLOLOL

Wow, that is awesome, learning! The ISTJ one is so me, too!

Originally posted by Prayers for MBTI Types

ISTJ: Lord, help me to relax about insignificant details beginning tomorrow at 11:41.23 a.m. EST.

Originally posted by Xavier

INTP/ENTP

I'm an Extroverted Introvert.

We all have mood swings.

And, indeed, during our day, or monthly we can swing or flucuate.

Ultimately, when we take the test, the best answer is the generally the most dominant state.

We all have our moods, of say, not answering the phone, and letting the voice mail catch it, and we can all show up at a party and in a down mood.

I am most often an Extrovert, so as an example, I generally gain energy from people and as a party goes through an evening, I get more and more energy.

Introverts actually get tired, and in contrast, actually gain energy by being alone.

I dated a Lady INFP - a caring Pediatrician, and we discussed the flip side of I/E.

YES!
YES! YES!

Man comes in only a dozen or so varieties.
The MBTT separates us, innately, into a dozen or so different predispositions.
One man's reality is different from another, all debatably "correct" in philosophical discourse.

This is why American mainstream Christianity has twelve different Churches. Our predisposition fuel opinion.

Those whole support Theistic Evolution, (TE), might be the only people ever able to make RATIONAL, non-metaphysical explanation of Genesis 11. And, the MBTT supports this view, as do the jubilant confirmations on this thread. That is, your personal testimonies here, concerning this Jungian Functional Psychology.

Gen. 11:1 And the whole earth (of mankind) was of one language,
saphah, [Hebrew: saphah/ meaning: "boundary"], (of one psychic, archetypal state of mind), and of one (way of thinking, of one manner of) speech (in the content of meaning). [Hebrew: dabar/ means: "content of what is bound"]).

Gen. 11:2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that, (these early forms of Homo sapiens), they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.

Gen. 11:3 And they, (these early forms of Homo sapiens), said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick forstone, and slime had they for mortar.

Gen. 11:4 And they, (these early forms of Homo sapiens), said, Go to, let us build us a city (of Conscious understandings), [iyr, city], (a paradigm of reality), [Hebrew: iyr/ meaning: "a place guarded by awakening"], and a tower, [Hebrew: migdal/meaning: a rostrum, a platform for speaking, a strong place for reasoning by which to understand the world] whose top, (concerning reiligious assumptions), may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, (a memory of our doctrines), [Hebrew: shem/ means: memory], lest we, (this early form of Homo sapiens), be scattered abroad (by the breaking of our psyches into Freudian archetypal pieces: I,E,J,P,F,T,N,S), [Hebrew: puwts/breaking], upon the face of the whole earth.

Gen. 11:5 And the LORD, (the Immanent God within man), came down to see the city (of man's Consciousness), [iyr: city], (their paradigm of His pantheistic reality),
[Hebrew: iyr/ a place guarded by
an awakening], and the tower, [migdal], (their wooden platform cut from the language tree for speaking, a strong place for reasoning by which to understand the world), [Hebrew: migdal/ rostrum], which the children of (this evolving form of) men builded, [banah], (in their thinking), [Hebrew: banah/ meaning: to add to an existing structure and fashion a new object, i.e.; a new paradigm of mythological Ancient Babylonian astrological religion].

Gen. 11:6 And the LORD, (the Immanent God within man), said, Behold, [am: behold], the (evolving) people [Hebrew:am/ means: all the physical ancestors who lived previously], is one (species), and they have all one language, (one psychological, archetypal boundary to their thought), [Hebrew/ saphah: means boundary to way of speaking], and this they begin to do, (to misunderstand the pantheistic world): and now nothing will be restrained from them (even foolishness), which they have imagined to do (to their own detriment).

Gen. 11:7 Go to, let us, (Gen 1:26-7; we pantheistic natural laws that formed these evolving creatures), go down, and there (mix together and mingle), confound, [balal: "mix"], their language, (their psychological, archetypal boundaries of thinking; [saphah: a boundary]), that they may not understand one another’s (psychological language), speech. [saphah: a boundary].

(Note: "speech," interpreted here, is the same Hebrew word as used above for "language," saphah).
{This is an error, or weak choice, in the translation. Saphah is the same word as in 11:1 which was translated as "language;" it means roughly translated, "boundaries of their thoughts as evidenced by the
language universal to them"}

Gen. 11:8 So the LORD scattered, them, (these early forms of Homo sapiens), abroad (by breaking their psyches into Freudian archetypal pieces: I,E,J,P,F,T,N,S), [Hebrew: puwts], from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city, [iyr:city], (their erroneous paradigm of the pantheistic reality), [iyr/ a place guarded by an awakening].

Gen. 11:9 Therefore is the "name," [shem], (or memory) of it called "Babel," (confusion, mental confusion), [Hebrew: babel/confusion]; because the LORD did (then), there (mix together and mingle), "confound," [Hebrew: balal/ mix, mingle], the "language," [saphah], (the psychic, archetypal boundary of their thoughts) of all the (men of this early form of Homo sapiens on the) earth: and from thence did the LORD "scatter," [puwts/ break into pieces], them, (psychologically, these early forms of Homo sapiens), abroad (by
breaking the psyches of these early forms of Homo sapiens into Freudian archetypal pieces: I,E,J,P,F,T,N,S) upon the face of all the earth.

There are 4 main personality types, with 16 subtyptes. (When looking at this personality theory).

Entj

Originally posted by theseed

There are 4 main personality types, with 16 subtyptes. (When looking at this personality theory).

Yes.
N, Intuition
S, Sensation
F, Feelings
T, Thinking

The "four winds" of our archetypal thinking functions are basic to the reasoning of Myers and Briggs in creating there MBTT system.

They reasoned that combinations of a dominant and auxillary Jungian Archetype would be "favored"
by every individual.

So, based on these four mental facilities, the possible combinations would mathematically permutate into 24 different possible sets.
But, Myers - Briggs assumed that certain combos seemed prohibited.
One either favored N or S, or T but not F.

This would have been very compatible with other psychological systems without such an assumption. In particular, the Luscher Functional Psychology uses twenty-four combos.

Luscher Functional Psychology is widely used in Germany, and throughout the EU in fact.
Certain commercial Industries have found Luscher's work applicable on a wide sociological basis. Volkswagon, for instance, and many household furnishing companies use Luscher to predict mood of consumers in order to estimate color preferences for cars and appliances and such.

Luscher gets twelve different possible perceptions/attitudinal postures as the inventory of types available to humans, genetically. Each of these has another side to it. It is what they call the Janus Syndrome, referring to the two-faced ancient mythological God.

One side is the person who is presented to us, while the other, inner person is hidden. In Max Luscher's Functional Psychology there are only (12) types, but twenty-four possible different perspectives are offered to the community.

IMO Luscher has the correct system, because Myers and Briggs made an arbitrary and, I believe, unfounded "assumption" that N and S can never be found in the same type. That is, there is no ESNP for instance. If that postulate is not correct, then MBTT reduces to Luscher's MLCT.

I have an email Luscher Color Preference Test available in anyone wishes to "take" the "test."

kofh@gis.net

Rev. 4:4 And round about the throne, (the Cerebrum), were four and twenty seats, (twelve paired Cranial Nerves): and upon the seats, (these nerves), I saw four andtwenty elders, (the 24 cranial nerves) sitting, clothed in (nerve sheaths of) white raiment; and they had on their heads crowns of gold, (the symbol of spiritual enlightenment).

ENFP - yep, that's me not only that but a champion! (whatever that means)
We make up 3 percent of the world's population...that could be why I always feel like a weird duck! Then champions make up 1 percent. This makes me a weirder duck among weirdo ducks.