An interesting article from creationwiki...

[Roy]

Anyone looking for the latest creationist ideas on archeology and genetics might want to talk a look at this (http://www.nwcreation.net/wiki/index.php?title=Adam%27s_Body_in_Noah%27s_Ark)

Free sample:
How did that group of scientists prove that every women on the earth came from one woman (who they named Eve) and every man from one man? Well, that's because they did DNA testing on Adam's body, that's how.

Roy

[dizzle]

And you think that creationists believe that? Seems more likely that there is someone trying to make creationists look stupid so is pretending to be one.

[shunyadragon]

And you think that creationists believe that? Seems more likely that there is someone trying to make creationists look stupid so is pretending to be one.No problem here about being a scientist. One glance at AIG concludes that AIG makes creationists look stupid, at least as far as science is concerned. A closer inspection reveals unbelievable self imposed ignorance.

They can take the fideist approach if everything else fails,

[sylas]

Anyone looking for the latest creationist ideas on archeology and genetics might want to talk a look at this (http://www.nwcreation.net/wiki/index.php?title=Adam%27s_Body_in_Noah%27s_Ark)

Free sample:
How did that group of scientists prove that every women on the earth came from one woman (who they named Eve) and every man from one man? Well, that's because they did DNA testing on Adam's body, that's how.

Roy

Wow. My first thought on reading this was: is this a parody?

Checked a bit, starting from the links supplied with the article, and bit of google. I think we have here the genuine article; a full metal jacket loonie. Not representative of anything but himself; and what a self it is. Wow.

Cheers -- Sylas

[Roy]

And you think that creationists believe that? Seems more likely that there is someone trying to make creationists look stupid so is pretending to be one.

That was my first thought too - but a bit of digging in the creationwiki logs shows it's been there a long time and the site administrators have edited that section frequently - and the admins are usually very prompt about removing unwanted content.* So I reckon there's at least one creationist who believes it.

Roy

*edited to add that they aren't always so conscientious about fact-checking

[shunyadragon]

That was my first thought too - but a bit of digging in the creationwiki logs shows it's been there a long time and the site administrators have edited that section frequently - and the admins are usually very prompt about removing unwanted content.* So I reckon there's at least one creationist who believes it.

Roy

*edited to add that they aren't always so conscientious about fact-checking
Is there anything here less rediculous than believing that all the movement of the continents, mountain building and glaciation took place in a few thousand years or less as AIG believes.l

[rogero]

Is there anything here less rediculous than believing that all the movement of the continents, mountain building and glaciation took place in a few thousand years or less as AIG believes.l


Do you mean more ridiculous? If so, I agree with you.

[kofh2u]

Is there anything here less rediculous than believing that all the movement of the continents, mountain building and glaciation took place in a few thousand years or less as AIG believes.l

What is ridiculous is the Thesis of Creatiomism, opposed by the Anti-thesis of Evolution, which is maintained in a dialectic discussion by stubborn, indoctrinated church people who are opposed by shameless atheists, both party to the delay of a Synthesis into Theistic Evolution,... ...is it not?