PDA

View Full Version : No men preachers either!


Amazing Rando
February 21st 2007, 12:45 PM
Yeah, you heard me!

:eek:

technomage
February 21st 2007, 12:48 PM
Can my cat preach? You'd always get home in time for lunch!

Timothy Leary
February 21st 2007, 09:50 PM
But I always wanted to be a preacher...

anthrogirl
February 21st 2007, 09:54 PM
Yeah, you heard me!

:eek:



:lol: Thanks Rando--that other thread really disgusted me. But your humor has made it all better!

just what the dr. ordered!


ag

Bill the Cat
February 21st 2007, 10:03 PM
So that means Gerbz is safe to preach then, right?

Amazing Rando
February 21st 2007, 10:48 PM
:lol: Thanks Rando--that other thread really disgusted me. But your humor has made it all better!

just what the dr. ordered!


ag

:teeth: So far the discussion in this thread has been about as deep and profound as that other one!

dizzle
February 21st 2007, 10:51 PM
Way to denigrate the deeply held convictions of a great many brethren :thumb: Sorry I can't be that deep and profound. :bow:

Spinyn00bman
February 21st 2007, 10:59 PM
So that means Gerbz is safe to preach then, right?

The bible says it's ok for rodents to preach?

Timothy Leary
February 21st 2007, 11:11 PM
does it say they can't? if it's not forbidden...

Johnny MacManky
February 21st 2007, 11:20 PM
The bible says it's ok for rodents to preach?
Who cares what the Bible says... After all, we're in Unorthodox Theology. We can do pretty much anything we like.

Perhaps if the man is gifted and called/led by the Holy Spirit then he should be allowed to preach. In fact, with such a gifting/calling/leading, it would be crazy not to have him preach.

On the other hand, if you had only one sucky guy in a church, just that 1 bloke and 10 wimins, and he had no gifts, etc, but all the wimins did, clearly he should still be the preacher.


(I can't remember the sarcasm/joking tag, but the example is one I have experienced.)

commonman
March 1st 2007, 06:20 PM
Yeah, you heard me!

:eek:

How about some scripture reference in this thread:


Jeremiah 31:31-34 (http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&q=Jeremiah+31%3A31-34) Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

Timothy Leary
March 1st 2007, 06:35 PM
Um, that's talking about a time when there will *not* be preachers dude... and the 'man' in that passage is generic

commonman
March 1st 2007, 06:42 PM
Um, that's talking about a time when there will *not* be preachers dude... and the 'man' in that passage is generic

I lean Preterist, therefore that time is now!

And the Hebrew word for man in the passage is iysh which means man, male (as in not woman, female).

commonman
March 1st 2007, 06:46 PM
Oh, and it specifically says, new covenant. That is the one we are living under, isn't it?

Timothy Leary
March 2nd 2007, 09:01 AM
And the Hebrew word for man in the passage is iysh which means man, male (as in not woman, female).

IIRC ish can be used generically just like adam can be but i'd have to look up an example and i don't have a tanach on me

Oh, and it specifically says, new covenant. That is the one we are living under, isn't it?

i have an odd understanding of this verse right now, that'll have to explain later maybe. but not now.