PDA

View Full Version : Split from John 3:13 in Theology 201


Clarice
June 7th 2007, 03:15 PM
In John 3:13 Jesus says
No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man.
The Greek ouranos(Strong's G3772) is translated as "Heaven."

How does this apply to Elijah?

As they were walking along and talking together, suddenly a chariot of fire and horses of fire appeared and separated the two of them, and Elijah went up to heaven in a whirlwind.
The Hebrew shamayim (Strong's H8064) is translated as heaven.

or Enoch?

Although the word translated heaven in other places is not used, it is assumed that is where he went, correct?
Enoch walked with God; then he was no more, because God took him away.
By faith Enoch was taken from this life, so that he did not experience death; he could not be found, because God had taken him away. For before he was taken, he was commended as one who pleased God.

or even Isaiah in his experience in Chapter 6?


How does the Greek word ouranos differ from the Hebrew shamayim?

Is Paradise (paradeisos) different than "Heaven"? If so, is that where Elijah et al went?

Perhaps some original language specialists can weigh in?

Posters are welcome to discuss unorthodox views, and ithe discussions should occur in this forum.

Good questions, zguy. Such queries can bring in light and clarity.

The two questions that come to mind is what is heaven? And what is the Son of Man?

Regarding the first, we know that heaven can mean different things or places. There is the Heaven that is Eternity, where the 'throne' of the Father dwells. But there is also a heaven associated with earth, from which evil comes (Ephesians 6:12), and which will be destroyed and made new along with the earth (2 Peter 3).

It is likely, reasonable, and biblical, that these are not the same realms.

And what is the Son of Man? Ezekiel is referred to as the Son of Man, and Paul speaks of the revealing of the Sons of Men in the end times (Romans 8:19-21).

Obviously, not every human is the Son of Man, but those who hold some type of high spiritual standing.

I would offer for your consideration that the Son of Man is one of whom John speaks...

12Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

I personally have concluded that Enoch, Elijah, and of course Jesus, are all those who have received Christ, the Annointing, and are fully liberated Sons of Man, One with the Father, knowing of His Heavenly realms. But not Paul. He was certainly a prophet, but his teachings reveal that he had not yet known Sonship, not yet become One with the Father, and so the heavens that he visited were the lesser heavens.

You might conclude something differently, zguy, based on your own personal experiences. Just asking though is a good beginning.




Clarice

Zguy28
June 7th 2007, 04:06 PM
Good questions, zguy. Such queries can bring in light and clarity.

The two questions that come to mind is what is heaven? And what is the Son of Man?

Regarding the first, we know that heaven can mean different things or places. There is the Heaven that is Eternity, where the 'throne' of the Father dwells. But there is also a heaven associated with earth, from which evil comes (Ephesians 6:12), and which will be destroyed and made new along with the earth (2 Peter 3).

It is likely, reasonable, and biblical, that these are not the same realms.

And what is the Son of Man? Ezekiel is referred to as the Son of Man, and Paul speaks of the revealing of the Sons of Men in the end times (Romans 8:19-21).

Obviously, not every human is the Son of Man, but those who hold some type of high spiritual standing.

I would offer for your consideration that the Son of Man is one of whom John speaks...

12Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

I personally have concluded that Enoch, Elijah, and of course Jesus, are all those who have received Christ, the Annointing, and are fully liberated Sons of Man, One with the Father, knowing of His Heavenly realms. But not Paul. He was certainly a prophet, but his teachings reveal that he had not yet known Sonship, not yet become One with the Father, and so the heavens that he visited were the lesser heavens.

You might conclude something differently, zguy, based on your own personal experiences. Just asking though is a good beginning.


ClariceI know Ezekiel was called the son of man, but I don't think he was the "son of Man who came from heaven" if you get my meaning.

The verse says "No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man."
Emphasis mine.

Clarice
June 7th 2007, 04:39 PM
I know Ezekiel was called the son of man, but I don't think he was the "son of Man who came from heaven" if you get my meaning.

The verse says "No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man."
Emphasis mine.

Is this what the Bible says, or what church tradition says?

Such understanding came under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the Bible being clear, but that clear meaning having been tainted and distorted by man's tradition.

Let's look at what Jesus says...

9 Nicodemus answered and said to Him, “How can these things be?”
10 Jesus answered and said to him, “Are you the teacher of Israel, and do not know these things? 11 Most assuredly, I say to you, We speak what We know and testify what We have seen, and you do not receive Our witness. 12 If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things? 13 No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven.

Notice he begins to answer Nicodemus' query by speaking of We testifying of what We have seen. And then goes on to say that only the Son of Man can testify about Heaven, for only the Son of Man has seen Heaven.

The Son of Man is a Spiritual term, also used in the OT, to refer to any of divine origin who freely take on flesh and blood, those who come from Heaven and then are born of woman, Sons of God becoming sons of men.

The Sons of Men are like Jesus as spoken of in Hebrews 2...

14 Inasmuch then as the children have partaken of flesh and blood, He Himself likewise shared in the same, that through death He might destroy him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and release those who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

The same that Solomon spoke of in Ecclesiastes...

12 I, the Preacher, was king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 And I set my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all that is done under heaven; this burdensome task God has given to the sons of man, by which they may be exercised.

The Sons of Man are those who came into this world from divine worlds, angels incarnating into flesh, to take on the burdensome task spoken of by Solomon, as well as other burdensome tasks.

Read for yourself, zguy, and let God guide you into all understanding.

At all costs, seek right understanding. King Solomon



Clarice

Zguy28
June 8th 2007, 12:21 PM
Is this what the Bible says, or what church tradition says?Is Ezekiel (or anyone else for that matter) ever called "He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven"? Notice the capital H?

Its not plural. And Jesus's use of the term is not as you suggest, it is a clear reference on Jesus's part to Daniel 7:13 and to his divinity.

"In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence.


Such understanding came under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the Bible being clear, but that clear meaning having been tainted and distorted by man's tradition.


Let's look at what Jesus says...

9 Nicodemus answered and said to Him, “How can these things be?”
10 Jesus answered and said to him, “Are you the teacher of Israel, and do not know these things? 11 Most assuredly, I say to you, We speak what We know and testify what We have seen, and you do not receive Our witness. 12 If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things? 13 No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven.

Notice he begins to answer Nicodemus' query by speaking of We testifying of what We have seen. And then goes on to say that only the Son of Man can testify about Heaven, for only the Son of Man has seen Heaven.

The Son of Man is a Spiritual term, also used in the OT, to refer to any of divine origin who freely take on flesh and blood, those who come from Heaven and then are born of woman, Sons of God becoming sons of men.

The Sons of Men are like Jesus as spoken of in Hebrews 2...

14 Inasmuch then as the children have partaken of flesh and blood, He Himself likewise shared in the same, that through death He might destroy him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and release those who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

The same that Solomon spoke of in Ecclesiastes...

12 I, the Preacher, was king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 And I set my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all that is done under heaven; this burdensome task God has given to the sons of man, by which they may be exercised.

The Sons of Man are those who came into this world from divine worlds, angels incarnating into flesh, to take on the burdensome task spoken of by Solomon, as well as other burdensome tasks.

Read for yourself, zguy, and let God guide you into all understanding.

At all costs, seek right understanding. King Solomon



ClariceEzekiel, nor the Apostles, nor Enoch or Elijah are angels who came from heaven willingly to become flesh. This is not orthodoxy; as a matter of fact its probably heresy.