Concerned Women for America
http://www.cwfa.org/articledisplay.a...egoryid=family

9/16/2003
By Jan LaRue, Chief Counsel

1. Homosexuals are seeking a special right. They already have the same right to marry the rest of us have-the right to marry a person of the opposite sex. Limiting marriage to one man and one woman doesn't discriminate on the basis of sex or sexual orientation.

2. It denies the self-evident truth of nature that male and female bodies are designed for and complement each other. Opposite-sex marriage is the natural means by which the human race reproduces.

3. Granting same-sex couples a license to marry will not create true marriage. Neither two men nor two women can become one flesh. Licensing the unnatural does not make it natural. It would be a state-sanctioned counterfeit, a sham and a fraud. A licensed electrician cannot produce power by taping two same-sex plugs together. Homosexual sex is dangerous and destructive to the human body and powerless for human reproduction.

4. Homosexual marriage will always be an abomination to God regardless of whether a clergyman performs the ceremony. When God calls something unholy, man cannot make it holy or bless it.

5. Homosexual marriage is as wrong as giving a man a license to marry his mother or daughter or sister or a group.

6. Homosexual marriage will harm children by denying them the love and nurture of a mom and dad. The only "procreation" homosexuals can engage in requires that a third party must be brought into the relationship.

7. Granting a marriage license to homosexuals because they engage in sex is as illogical as granting a medical license to a barber because he wears a white coat or a law license to a salesman because he carries a briefcase. Real doctors, lawyers and the public would suffer as a result of licensing the unqualified and granting them rights, benefits and responsibilities as if they were qualified.

8. Homosexual marriage will devalue your marriage. A license to marry is a legal document by which government will treat same-sex marriage as if it were equal to the real thing. A license speaks for the government and will tell society that government says the marriages are equal. Any time a lesser thing is made equal to a greater, the greater is devalued. For example:

- If the Smithsonian Museum displays a hunk of polished blue glass next to the Hope Diamond with a sign that says, "These are of equal value," and treats them as if they were, the Hope Diamond is devalued in the public's eye. The government says it's just expensive blue glass. The history and mystery are lost too.

- If an employer uses a robot as an employee and treats the robot the same way it treats human employees, human employees are devalued. By doing so, the employer says, "A robot can do your job, you're no better." What will you and the public think of your job and you?

- If the government issues a license to babysitters that grants them the same rights, protections and responsibilities as a child's parents, parenthood is devalued. The government says parents are just babysitters.

- If government grants professional licenses to just anybody, every profession and qualified professional is devalued. The government says an uneducated panhandler can do brain surgery.

9. The assumption by many is that marriage is just two people with a license who have sex and wear rings. Homosexuals do that?why not give them the license? Engaging in sex doesn't equal marriage. Adults involved in incest have sex too; should government call it marriage and license them? Certainly not.

10. The biggest problem we have in getting people, especially younger ones, to understand why marriage is devalued by the existence of a counterfeit is that much of the public does not value marriage at all. Adultery is no big deal. No- fault divorce is tolerated. Absentee fathers and mothers devalue marriage. Unmarried pregnancies are common. Fornication is "normal." When we make the case against homosexual marriage, we need to speak against these other problems that devalue marriage too. As we acknowledge these problems we can emphasize that legalizing homosexual marriage will compound the problems, not solve or lessen them.

1. No, homosexuals are seeking the SAME rights others enjoy

2. Homosexuals have no problem with the "design". And, no, sex is the natural means of reproduction, not marriage. Marriage serves to provide support and learning for immature offspring - however produced

3. Whew, I never saw the "one flesh" in my home - my mother and father were always distinguishable in their committed relationship. Electricity must come from a source - the weakness off this point is also that homosexuals can produce the same kind of "electric energy".

4. God's word is open to prayful, spiritful interpreation that has a conclusion other than this point.

5. This arguement is as wrong as trying to fish with an anchor and cable.

6. Two points in one - one doesn't follow from the other. Love and nurture IS avaivable from a homosexual couple. The only "third party" is the child that has been abandoned.

7. Granting a marriage license to heterosexuals because they engage or want to engage in sex is as illogical .... (use any of the really weak examples)

8. Having the rights of "next of kin" will specifically devalue a heterosexual marriage how? Not mentioned!

9.This point negates point #7. We know #7 is wrong. This one is wrong becaise incest is against the law - same sex sodomy is not.

10. This point tries to make homosexuality a scrapegoat by inclusion with the failings of heterosexuals.

Boy, that was easy! Now they have nothing to say.